A systematic review on ‘Foveal Crowding’ in visually impaired children and perceptual learning as a method to reduce Crowding
© Huurneman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 29 October 2011
Accepted: 23 July 2012
Published: 23 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Oct 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Nov 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Bianca Huurneman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Nov 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ben Balas|
|20 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - dennis levi|
|28 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Girdhar Agarwal|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Bianca Huurneman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Girdhar Agarwal|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2415-12-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.