A comparison of the sensitivity of EQ-5D, SF-6D and TTO utility values to changes in vision and perceived visual function in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
© Bozzani et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 February 2012
Accepted: 25 July 2012
Published: 21 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louise Longworth|
|25 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Augusto Azuara-blanco|
|27 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Labiris|
|29 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Fiammetta Bozzani|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Labiris|
|19 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louise Longworth|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|21 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2415-12-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.