In vivo confocal microscopy in goldenhar syndrome: a case report
© Triolo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 14 January 2013
Accepted: 30 July 2013
Published: 16 October 2013
Goldenhar Syndrome is characterized by malformations of multiple anatomical districts. Between these, bulbar dermoids are common and represent a significant clinical problem as they can affect both ocular function and aesthetic comfort.
Histologic characterization of dermoids has been extensively performed; however, no reports exist describing in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) of these lesions. We aimed to (i) describe the in vivo confocal morphology of limbal dermoids in Goldenhar syndrome and (ii) compare these findings with standard light microscopy.
A 15-year-old Caucasian female affected by Goldenhar Syndrome showed a left, infero-temporal, limbal neoformation, with extension to the left orbital region. Prior to surgical removal, IVCM was performed with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, Cornea Module, using the “section” modality. The IVCM sections showed structures resembling corneal epithelium and vascular structures. Surgical removal of the lesion was decided as it caused poor eyelid closure. After surgical removal, sectioning and standard optical microscopy were performed. The comparison between IVCM imaging and standard microscopy sections were highly correlated in the detection of the pilar and vascular structures.
This study showed that IVCM may be a useful technique to study limbal dermoids, given its ability to detect typical microscopic features and its comparability to optical microscopy, which is the current standard.
KeywordsIn vivo confocal microscopy Goldenhar syndrome Dermoid
Goldenhar Syndrome (GS) is a polymalformation syndrome characterized by uni- or bilateral microtia, mandibular region hypoplasia, hemifacial microsomy, ocular and auricolar anomalies, skeleton vertebral anomalies and other types of malformations [1, 2]. GS has a variable frequency from 1:3500 to 1:26000 born children with a male predominance (M:F=3:2). The majority of GS cases are sporadic, but familial cases support an autosomal dominant or recessive pattern of inheritance [3, 4].
The etiology is still unknown and debated. Several pathogenetic mechanisms have been proposed; however it is commonly accepted that some type of vascular perturbation and neural crestopathy occur in a critical time point of ocular embryogenesis .
Ocular findings are frequently reported in GS: epibulbar dermoids are the most common manifestation, reported in a variable percentage of these patients (6-39%) [1, 2, 6]; other ocular features include microphthalmia (6%), cataract, chorioretinal atrophy, nasolacrimal duct stenosis and coloboma of eyelids (3%) . Optical microscopy studies demonstrated a dense fibrous derma-like tissue, with the presence of sporadic hair follicles; a smaller, deeper component was also described, consisting of hypodermic tissue with diffuse adipocytes [7, 8].
The use of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) has already entered the clinical practice for the diagnosis of amoebic and fungal keratitis, and in the follow-up of refractive surgery patients .
However, the histopathology of the epibulbar dermoids has not been studied with IVCM yet.
We report the case of a 15 year old female patient with diagnosis of GS: she underwent surgical excision of left, infero-temporal limbal dermoid. The purpose of this study is to describe the pathology of limbal dermoids as imaged with IVCM, and to compare these findings with standard optical microscopy.
The clinical ocular findings were normal for the rest, with a BCVA of 0.1 logMAR, transparent central cornea and normal features of the anterior chamber. As the lesion did not allow normal closure of the eyelids and there was an aesthetic issue, surgical removal of the lesion was decided. The post surgical course was regular with no complications (Figure 1, panel B).
After removal, the tissue was oriented, fixed in 10% formalin and processed to obtain standard microscopy sections perpendicular to the ocular surface. This confirmed the lesion to be a solid limbal dermoid associated with Goldenhar Syndrome. The tissue was characterized by stratified squamous epithelium resembling epidermis with an irregularly thin, keratinized superficial layer (Figure 4, panel A and B). The stroma appeared dense and paucicellular and contained a disordered number of pilar structures, sebaceous glands, lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate (Figure 4, panel A), and vascular structures (Figure 4, panel B). Empty vacuolar structures were also identified, representing adipose tissue (Figure 4).
This study showed that IVCM may be a valid technique to characterize the histology of limbal dermoids, given its ability to recognize the main typical microscopic features of this lesion and its comparability to optical microscopy, which is the current standard. Specifically, both methods were highly comparable in the detection of pilar and vascular structures.
IVCM also has intrinsic limitations, such as the impossibility to perform specific staining. Moreover, it is difficult to image exactly the same area with both IVCM and optical microscopy, due to the absence of unequivocal reference points. However, we tried to reduce these downsides by careful orienting the dermoid when preparing histologic sections. In fact, optical microscopy for ocular pathology specimens commonly performed perpendicularly to the surface of the lesion, differently from IVCM, which captures sections parallel to the surface. For this reason we specifically asked the pathologist to obtain histologic sections corresponding to the confocal imaging.
In light of our results, we plan to increase the patient sample to further confirm our findings in a group of patients affected with Goldenhar syndrome. In particular, it would be interesting to test whether peculiar histologic phenotypes (i.e. extensive vascular ramification, microareolar pattern, density of pilar structures) are associated with a different growth rate of these lesions. In these regards, IVCM could represent a helpful prognostic tool to predict the evolution of the lesion when discussing surgical removal of dermoids in Goldenhar Syndrome. In fact, given the extremely low rate of malignant transformation, “wait and see” could be a wise choice when they do not represent an aesthetic or functional issue. Moreover, this technique could play a key role in surgical planning, allowing prompt removal of lesions showing a “fast growing” phenotype, finally allowing better functional recovery.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this Journal.
- Engiz O, Balci S, Unsal M, Ozer S, Oguz KK, Aktas D: 31 cases with oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia (Goldenhar syndrome): clinical, neuroradiologic, audiologic and cytogenetic findings. Genet Couns. 2007, 18: 277-288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rollnick BR, Kaye CI, Nagatoshi K, Hauck W, Martin AO: Oculoauriculovertebral dysplasia and variants: phenotypic characteristics of 294 patients. Am J Med Genet. 1987, 26: 361-375. 10.1002/ajmg.1320260215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaye CI, Martin AO, Rollnick BR, Nagatoshi K, Israel J, Hermanoff M, Tropea B, Richtsmeier JT, Morton NE: Oculoauriculovertebral anomaly: segregation analysis. Am J Med Genet. 1992, 43: 913-917. 10.1002/ajmg.1320430602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rollnick BR: Oculoauriculovertebral anomaly: variability and causal heterogeneity. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1988, 4: 41-53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hartsfield JK: Review of the etiologic heterogeneity of the oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum (Hemifacial Microsomia). Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007, 10: 121-128. 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00391.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mansour AM, Wang F, Henkind P, Goldberg R, Shprintzen R: Ocular findings in the facio-auriculovertebral sequence (Goldenhar-Gorlin syndrome). Am J Ophthalmol. 1984, 91: 1327-1333.Google Scholar
- D’Hermies F, Saragoussi JJ, Meyer A, Morel X, Fayet B, Dighiero P, Than-Trong T, Halhal M, Vu TA, Elmaleh C, Renard G: Limbal dermoid and Goldenhar syndrome. Report of an anatomoclinical study. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2001, 24: 893-896.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jakobiec FA, Pineda R, Rivera R, Hsu-Winges C, Cherwek D: Epicorneal polypoidal lipodermoid: lack of association of central corneal lesions with Goldenhar syndrome verified with a review of the literature. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010, 55: 78-84. 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.05.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman SC, Musch DC, Belin MW, Cohen EJ, Meisler DM, Reinhart WJ, Udell IJ, Van Meter WS: Confocal microscopy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmol. 2004, 111: 396-406. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.12.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/13/55/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.