A case with transient refractive change after removal of pituitary tumor
© Ishikawa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 October 2012
Accepted: 31 October 2013
Published: 1 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - rafael iribarren|
|16 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Goldblum|
|5 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Majid Moshirfar|
|14 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroto Ishikawa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Goldblum|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - rafael iribarren|
|21 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroto Ishikawa|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2415-13-65|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.