Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors after selective laser trabeculoplasty in pseudoexfoliative secondary glaucoma

  • Mauro Cellini1Email author,
  • Pietro Leonetti1,
  • Ernesto Strobbe1 and
  • Emilio C Campos1
BMC Ophthalmology20088:20

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-8-20

Received: 26 August 2008

Accepted: 21 October 2008

Published: 21 October 2008

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to assess changes in metalloproteinases (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-2) following selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG).

Methods

We enrolled 15 patients with PEXG and cataracts (PEXG-C group) and good intraocular pressure (IOP) controlled with β-blockers and dorzolamide eye drops who were treated by cataract phacoemulsification and 15 patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG-SLT group). The PEXG-SLT patients underwent a trabeculectomy for uncontrolled IOP in the eye that showed increased IOP despite the maximum drug treatment with β-blockers and dorzolamide eye drops and after ineffective selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). The control group consisted of 15 subjects with cataracts. Aqueous humor was aspirated during surgery from patients with PEXG-C, PEXG-SLT and from matched control patients with cataracts during cataract surgery or trabeculectomy. The concentrations of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in the aqueous humor were assessed with commercially available ELISA kits.

Results

In PEXG-SLT group in the first 10 days after SLT treatment a significant reduction in IOP was observed: 25.8 ± 1.9 vs 18.1.0 ± 1.4 mm/Hg (p < 0.001), but after a mean time of 31.5 ± 7.6 days IOP increased and returned to pretreatment levels: 25.4 ± 1.6 mm/Hg (p < 0.591). Therefore a trabeculectomy was considered necessary.

The MMP-2 in PEXG-C was 57.77 ± 9.25 μg/ml and in PEXG-SLT was 58.52 ± 9.66 μg/ml (p < 0.066). TIMP-2 was 105.19 ± 28.53 μg/ml in PEXG-C and 105.96 ± 27.65 μg/ml in PEXG-SLT (p < 0.202). The MMP-2/TIMP-2 ratio in the normal subjects was 1.11 ± 0.44. This ratio increase to 1.88 ± 0.65 in PEXG-C (p < 0.001) and to 1.87 ± 0.64 in PEXG-SLT (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the PEXG-C and PEXG-SLT ratios (p < 0.671).

Conclusion

This case series suggest that IOP elevation after SLT can be a serious adverse event in some PEXG patients. The IOP increase in these cases would be correlated to the failure to decrease the TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN79745214

Background

Argon laser trabeculoplasty has become the standard method of treatment for medically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma [1, 2]. It has been in use since 1979 when it was first described by Wise [3] and different types of lasers with various wavelengths have been investigated. The first laser used was an argon laser, but recently a Q switched frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser was proposed for use in trabeculoplasty [4, 5], described as selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT).

A number of theories have been proposed to explain the effect of argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT) and SLT on aqueous outflow. The mechanical theory suggests that ALT causes photocoagulative damage to the trabecular meshwork (TM), which results in collagen shrinkage and subsequent scarring of the TM [6]. The cellular theory is based on the migration of macrophages, due to coagulative necrosis induced by laser burns, which phagocytose debris and clear the TM [6]. SLT selectively targets pigmented TM cells, while it spares collateral cells and tissue from thermal damage and can maintain the architecture of the TM [7]. Experiments have shown that there is also a third mechanism involved in laser trabeculoplasty which causes an increase in the production of metalloproteinases (MMPs) induced by the TM photocoagulation [8, 9]. These enzymes are responsible for the extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover. Their action is countered by a family of tissue inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs).

The aim of this study was to assess changes in the MMP-2 and TIMP-2 values in a group of patients with pseudoexfoliative syndrome glaucoma (PEXG) in whom SLT failed to decrease intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods

We assess the MMP-2 and TIMP-2 values in the aqueous samples of 15 patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG-SLT group) (8 males and 7 females aged from 58 to 66, mean 63.8 yrs) that presented post-SLT IOP elevations. As control groups we enrolled 15 patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and cataracts (PEXG-C group) (9 females and 6 males, aged from 61 to 68, mean 65.4 yrs) and 15 subjects with cataracts (4 males and 11 females aged between 62 and 74 years, mean 68.3 yrs), All patients were recruited from the Glaucoma Disease Service and from the Ophthalmology Services of the S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna.

Patients with other ocular or systemic disorders, such as inflammatory diseases or diabetes mellitus, were excluded from the study.

The study was approved by the institutional ethic committee of the S. Orsola-Malpighi hospital (ref: 2007-007744-98). Before enrolment, patients were informed of the procedures and the aim of the study following which they signed a written consent form.

After a complete ocular examination, including assessment of visual acuity, anterior segment biomicroscopy, applanation tonometry and visual field evaluation (Humphrey 30.2 full threshold programme), the PEXG-C patients who had good intraocular pressure (IOP) control with β-blockers and dorzolamide eye drops underwent cataract phacoemulsification. The PEXG-SLT patients underwent a trabeculectomy for uncontrolled IOP in the eye that showed increased IOP, despite being under maximum drug treatment with β-blockers and dorzolamide eye drops and after having received selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT).

SLT was performed with a Selecta 7000 (Q switched, frequency doubled, 532 Nd:YAG laser) using 50 non-overlapping applications in the inferior 180° of the trabecular meshwork, with a spot size of 400 μm and pulse duration of 3 ns. The initial energy used was 0.8 mJ. The energy was increased or decreased until bubble formation and then was decreased by 0.1 mJ for the remainder of the treatment.

The laser treatment was considered to be effective when a decrease of 20% in the IOP was obtained as compared to the base values or when the visual field was stabilized.

In the first 10 days after SLT treatment a significant reduction in IOP was observed: 25.8 ± 1.9 vs 18.1.0 ± 1.4 mm/Hg (p < 0.001), but after a mean time of 31.5 ± 7.6 days IOP increased and returned to pretreatment levels: 25.4 ± 1.6 mm/Hg (p < 0.591). Therefore a trabeculectomy was considered necessary.

Before enrolment, all patients were informed of the procedures and the aim of the study and they signed a written consent form.

Aqueous humor was aspirated during surgery from patients with PEXG-C, PEXG-SLT and from matched control patients with cataracts. Thus 80–100 μl of aqueous humor was aspirated through an ab externo limbal paracentesis site using a tuberculin syringe with a 30-gauge needle. Meticulous care was taken to avoid touching intraocular tissues and to prevent contamination of the aqueous samples with blood. The samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

The concentrations of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in aqueous humor were assessed by ELISA using commercially available enzyme immunoassay kits (Biotrak; Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Differences in MMP-2 and TIMP-2 levels between groups, as measured by ELISA in aqueous humor samples, were statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). The analysis was performed using SSI (version 11, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, California, USA) for Macintosh.

Results

There was a significant difference between controls and PEXG-C in terms of MMP-2 (p < 0.013) and TIMP-2 (p < 0.005) values. The same statistical significance was found in PEXG-SLT both for MMP-2 (p < 0.013) and TIMP-2 (p < 0.005).

The TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio in controls was 1.11 ± 0.44. This ratio increased to 1.88 ± 0.65 in PEXG-C (p < 0.001) and to 1.87 ± 0.64 in PEXG-SLT (p < 0.001).

The PEXG-C and PEXG-SLT ratios were not significantly different (p < 0.671).

The results are summarised in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in PEXG with cataract, PEXG after SLT and Cataract groups.

 

Cataract

PEXG-C

p < 0.05

PEXG-SLT

p < 0.05

MMP-2 ng/mL

55.04 ± 10.24

57.77 ± 9.25

0.013

58.52 ± 9.66

0.013

TIMP-2 ng/mL

54.43 ± 8.18

105.19 ± 28.53

0.005

105.96 ± 27.65

0.005

TIMP-2/MMP-2

1.11 ± 0.44

1.88 ± 0.65

0.001

1.87 ± 0.64

0.001

Levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in aqueous humor and TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio of patients with PEXG and cataract (PEXG-C), PEXG after selective laser trabeculoplasty (PEXG-SLT) and in healthy patients with cataract.

Table 2

MMP-2 and TIMP-2 levels in PEXG with cataract and PEXG after SLT

 

PEXG-C

PEXG-SLT

p < 0.05

MMP-2 ng/mL

57.77 ± 9.25

58.52 ± 9.66

0.066

TIMP-2 ng/mL

105.19 ± 28.53

105.96 ± 27.65

0.202

TIMP-2/MMP-2

1.88 ± 0.65

1.87 ± 0.64

0.671

Levels of MMP-2 and TIMP-2 and their ratio in patients with PEXG with cataract (PEXG-C) and in patients with PEXG after selective laser trabeculoplasty (PEXG-SLT)

Discussion

Our study shows that the TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio is higher in patients with PEXG-C and PEXG-SLT than in the cataract control group.

After the initial success of selective laser trabeculoplasty treatment with a reduction in IOP of 20% compared with the baseline values, eyes with PEXG-SLT showed a progressive increase in IOP, which, after a mean of one month returned to similar values to those presented before treatment. The TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio in the PEXG-SLT patients did not differ significantly from that in PEXG-C patients (p < 0.671).

SLT has been shown to be effective in long- and short-term treatment of POAG and is comparable to ALT [5, 9] but some studies have reported post-operative IOP increase as a complication of SLT [5, 911]. The mean incidence of increased IOP after SLT is 2.4% but no author has specified whether eyes in which SLT had failed had special trabecular meshwork features. Only Harasymowycz et al. reported the complication of IOP elevations after SLT in patients with a heavily pigmented trabecular meshwork [11] that required surgical trabeculectomy. They suggested that increased IOP may be related to trabeculitis or increased angle scarring [11].

The active mechanism of selective laser trabeculoplasty is still the subject of debate, although it has been suggested that besides the action focused on the pigmented cells of the trabecular meshwork [4] there is also an enzymatic action that stimulates the production of metalloproteinases [8, 9], as already demonstrated experimentally with other types of laser [13].

Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a very numerous and heterogeneous family of zinc-dependent proteinases that fulfil the role of degrading the ECM components to maintain homeostasis [14, 15]. The various enzymes are distinguished on the basis of the type of media that they degrade: collagenases, gelatinases, stromelinases and the membrane-type MMPs [1719].

MMPs are secreted in the form of zymogens (pro-enzymes) that are activated by a selective proteolysis by part of a serine proteinase. Once activated, MMPs begin their proteolytic action on the ECM [1719]. To guarantee the balance between ECM degradation and deposition there are tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) that block them [13, 15, 18, 19].

MMP-2 is the major metalloproteinase secreted after laser therapy and is inhibited by TIMP-2 [8, 20, 21]. In pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG), the enzyme balance between MMP-2 and TIMP-2, already impaired by the pseudoexfoliative syndrome (PEX), is seriously altered even compared with POAG [22, 23].

PEX is a degenerative fibrillopathy characterised by the production and accumulation of extracellular fibrillar material, not just in the anterior segment of the eye [24], but also in numerous extraocular tissues [25, 26]. At an ocular level, there is atrophy of the iris dilator muscle fiber cells [27, 28], degeneration of the irideal pigment with dispersion of melanin, peripupillar atrophy and an increase in the trabecular meshwork pigmentation [2931]. Furthermore, at the iris level there is also a general vasculopathy with deposits of pseudoexfoliative material that lead to a thinning of the basal membrane and degeneration of the adventitial cells [32, 33], which explains the hypoperfusion and neovascularization of the iris [34, 35].

As for the trabecular meshwork, a typical feature is the excessive accumulation of the extracellular matrix material in the juxtacanalicular tissue [36]. This accumulation explains the increased resistance to aqueous outflow found in eyes with PEX [37, 38]. The deposits that are found in the iris vessels and the trabecular meshwork in PEX consist of numerous substances, including laminin, fibronectin, alpha-elastin, tropoelastin, fibrillin and P-amyloid protein [24].

P-amyloid protein plays an important role in the alteration of ECM homeostasis since it can increase MMP production and activity [39].

In our study levels of MMP-2, the predominant gelatinase in aqueous humor, and TIMP-2 in PEXG and controls were in line with previous findings [22, 23].

Our results suggest that in this case series of PEXG, a particular type of glaucoma in which there is upregulation of MMP-2 production with a marked increase in the relative inhibitors [22, 23], the changes in the TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio that can be obtained with laser trabeculoplasty are insignificant and thus are unable to decrease intraocular pressure.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we can be said that in some cases of PEXG may be a significant risk of IOP elevation after SLT. The IOP increase in these cases would be correlated to the failure to decrease the TIMP-2/MMP-2 ratio.

Further studies are needed for evaluation of this phenomenon and determination for incidence.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the University of Bologna (ECC-MIUR ex-60%), in part by a grant from the "Fondazione Banca del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna" and in part by a gift from the "Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Bologna".

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery Science and Anesthesiology, Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna

References

  1. Weinreb RN, Tsai S: Laser trabeculoplasty. The glaucomas: glaucoma therapy. Edited by: Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. 1996, St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1575-90. 2Google Scholar
  2. Melamed S, Simon GJB, Levkovitch-Verbin H: Selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatment for open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003, 121: 957-960. 10.1001/archopht.121.7.957.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wise JB, Witter SL: Argon laser therapy for open angle glaucoma: a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979, 97: 319-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Latina MA, Park C: Selective targeting of trabecular meshwork cells: in vitro studies of pulsed and Q-sw laser interactions. Exp Eye Res. 1995, 60: 359-72. 10.1016/S0014-4835(05)80093-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Damji KF, Shah KC, Rock WJ, Bains HS, Hodge WG: Selective laser trabeculoplasty vs argon laser trabeculoplasty: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999, 83: 718-722.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sanfilippo P: A review of argon and selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatments of open-angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom. 1999, 82 (6): 225-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kramer TR, Noecker RJ: Comparison of the morphologic changes after selective laser trabeculoplasty and argon laser trabeculoplasty in human eye bank eyes. Ophthalmology. 2001, 108: 773-779. 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00660-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradly JM, Anderssohn AM, Colvis CM, Parshley DE, Zhu XH, Ruddat MS, Samples JR, Acott TS: Mediation of laser trabeculoplasty induced matrix metalloproteinase expression by IL-1β and TNFα. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41: 422-430.Google Scholar
  9. Latina MA, DeLeon JM: Selective laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmol Clin N Am. 2005, 18: 409-419. 10.1016/j.ohc.2005.05.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Latina MA, Tumbocon JA: Selective laser trabeculoplasty a new treatment option for open angle glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002, 13: 94-96. 10.1097/00055735-200204000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Harasymowycz PJ, Papamatheakis DG, Latina M, De Leon M, Lesk M, Damji KF: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) complicated by intraocular pressure elevation in eyes with heavily pigmented trabecular meshworks. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005, 139: 1110-1113. 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.11.038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Parshley DE, Bradley JM, Fisk A, Hadaegh A, Samples JR, Van Buskirk EM, Acott TS: Laser trabeculoplasty induces stromelysin expression by trabecular juxtacanilicular cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996, 37: 795-804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nagase H: Matrix metalloproteinases. A mini-review. Contrib Nephrol. 1994, 107: 85-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Springman EB, Angleton EL, Birkedal-Hansen H, Van Wart HE: Multiple modes of activation of latent human fibroblast collagenases: evidence for the role of a Cys37 active-site zinc complex in latency and a "cysteine switch" mechanism for activation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 364-368. 10.1073/pnas.87.1.364.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy G, Willenbrock F, Crabbe T, O'Shea M, Ward R, Atkinson S, O'Connell J, Docherty A: Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase activity. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1994, 732: 31-41. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb24722.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nagase H, Enghild JJ, Suzuki K, Salvesen G: Stepwise activation mechanisms of the precursor of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysin) by proteinases and (4-aminophenyl) mercuric acetate. Biochemistry. 1990, 29: 5783-5789. 10.1021/bi00476a020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ogata Y, Enghild JJ, Nagase H: Matrix metalloproteinase 3 (stromelysin) activates the precursor for the human matrix metalloproteinase 9. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 3581-3584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Birkedal-Hansen H, Moore WG, Bodden MK, Windosor LJ, Birkedal-Hansen B, De Carlo A, Engler JA: Matrix metalloproteinases: a review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1993, 4: 197-250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Denhardt DT, Feng B, Edwards DR, Cocuzzi ET, Malyankar UM: Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP, aka EPA): structure, control of expression and biological functions. Pharmacol Ther. 1993, 59: 329-341. 10.1016/0163-7258(93)90074-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gomez DE, Alonso DF, Yoshiji H, Thorgeirsson UP: Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases: structure regulation and biological functions. Eur J Cell Biol. 1997, 74: 111-122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Howard EW, Banda MJ: Binding of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 2 to two distinct sites on human 72-kDa gelatinase. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266: 17972-17977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Lommatzsch J, Kuchle M, Konstas AG, Naumann GO: Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in acqueous humor of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003, 44: 1117-1125. 10.1167/iovs.02-0365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Määttä M, Tervahartiala T, Harju M, Airaksinen J, Auto-Harmainen H, Sorsa T: Matrix metalloproteinases and their tussue inhibitors an aqueous humor of patients with primary open angle glaucoma, exfoliation syndrome and exfoliation glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005, 14: 64-69. 10.1097/01.ijg.0000145812.39224.0a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U: Exfoliation Syndrome. Survey Ophthalmol. 2001, 45: 265-314. 10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00196-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Koca MR, Naumann GO, Volkholz H: Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: ocular manifestation of a systemic disorder?. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992, 110: 1752-1756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Streeten BW, Li Z-Y, Wallace RN, Eagle RC, Keshgegian AA: Pseudoextoliative fibrillopathy in visceral organs of a patient with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992, 110: 1757-1762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Carpel EF: Pupillary dilatation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988, 105: 692-694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Watson NJ, Winder S, Green FD: Pupil dilatation in the pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Eye. 1995, 9: 341-343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen E, Sellevold OJ: Pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule, II. Development of the exfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1969, 47 (1): 161-173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Prince AM, Ritch R: Clinical signs of the pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1986, 93: 803-807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Repo LP, Teràsvirta ME, Tuovinen EJ: Generalized peripheral iris transluminance in the pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1990, 97: 1027-1029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Asano A, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO: A histopathologic study of iris changes in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1995, 102: 1279-1290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Konstas AGP, Marshall GE, Cameron SA, Lee WR: Morphology of iris vasculopathy in exfoliation glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993, 71 (6): 751-759.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Brooks AMV, Gillies WE: Fluorescein angiography and fluorophotometry of the iris in pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983, 67: 249-254. 10.1136/bjo.67.4.249.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Vannas A: Vascular changes in pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule and capsular glaucoma: a fluorescein angiographic and electron microscopic study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1972, 184: 248-253. 10.1007/BF00413298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hammer T, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Naumann GO: Unilateral or asymmetric pseudoexfoliation syndrome?. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001, 119: 1023-1031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pohjanpelto PE: The fellow eye in unilateral hypertensive pseudoexfoliation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973, 75: 216-220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Gharagozloo NZ, Baker RH, Brubaker RF: Aqueous dynamics in exfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992, 114: 473-478.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Jung S, Zhang W, Van Nostrand WE: Pathogenic A beta induces the expression and activation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in human cerebrovascolar smooth muscle cells. J Neurochem. 2003, 85: 1208-1215. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01745.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2415/8/20/prepub

Copyright

© Cellini et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement