Iridoschisis: a case report and literature review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 April 2016
Accepted: 3 March 2017
Published: 14 March 2017
Iridoschisis is a rare condition that is characterized by the separation of the iris stroma into layers, with portions of the anterior layer floating freely in the aqueous humour. Here, we report three cases of iridoschisis that were complicated by either a cataract or glaucoma. Based on these cases, we speculate that the scope of iridoschisis has a rare association with intraocular pressure and the loss of corneal endothelial cells after surgery, which is mainly due to the surgery and not iridocorneal mechanical contact.
We report three cases of iridoschisis, two of which were complicated by cataracts and the third by glaucoma. Patient 1 was a 69-year-old man with bilateral iridoschisis complicated by a cataract but not glaucoma, even though the entire anterior layer of the iris stroma in the right eye presented as white atrophic strands. To prevent the detached iris fibrils from invading the phacoemulsification tip and the irrigation/aspiration hand piece port, the separated iris stroma that was floating freely in the aqueous humour was cut with scissors immediately before the cataract extraction. Patient 2 was an 87-year-old woman with iridoschisis complicated by a cataract in the right eye. We successfully performed cataract surgery on the right eye without a pupillary device. Patient 3 was a 66-year-old man who presented with increased intraocular pressure with bilateral iridoschisis. He was discharged and prescribed with a combination of four glaucoma drugs.
Patients with iridoschisis should have continuous follow-up because complications may occur, and extra care from ophthalmologists is required.
KeywordsIridoschisis Iris degeneration Cataract Phacoemulsification Glaucoma
Iridoschisis is a rare condition in which the stroma of the iris is cleaved into two or more layers, and atrophy causes the anterior portion to disintegrate into fibrils with free ends that float in the anterior chamber (AC) [1, 2]. The age of onset of iridoschisis is most often between 60 and 70 years of age, and this condition usually originates in the inferior quadrants of the iris . Iridoschisis is often associated with cataracts, angle-closure glaucoma, trauma, syphilitic interstitial keratitis, and congenital abnormalities [2, 4–6]. Patients with iridoschisis have experienced either abnormal intraocular pressure (IOP) or endothelial cell loss. However, in this case report, we suggest that the scope of the iris iridoschisis was not an important factor in the IOP and that the corneal endothelial cell loss after surgery was generally ascribed to the procedures during the surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this suggestion has not been previously reported.
Case 1 involved a 69-year-old male who presented with one month of blurred vision and an exacerbation of this blurred vision for the preceding ten days in the right eye (OD). The patient had no history of ocular trauma or heritable ocular disease. He had been suffering from hypertension for 15 years and was receiving antihypertensive treatment.
Phacoemulsification (PHACO) was first performed on the right eye and was then conducted on the left eye one month later. During surgery, the freely floating iris fibrils were cut with Vannas capsulotomy scissors. A foldable hydrophobic acrylic IQ intraocular lens (IOL) (Acry-Sof® SN60WF, Alcon Laboratories Inc.) was safely implanted in the capsular bag. Postoperative examinations were conducted at 1, 7, 30, and 60 days following the procedure.
One day after the surgery on the right eye, the UCVA of the right eye was FC/30 cm, and the IOP was 13 mmHg. A slit-lamp examination showed moderate ocular hyperaemia and corneal oedema. The AC depth was normal, and the pupil was round and undamaged. One week after surgery, the UCVA was 20/50 and the IOP was 15 mmHg. The ocular hyperaemia had disappeared, and there was mild corneal oedema that was improving. One month after surgery, the UCVA was 20/40 and the IOP was 17 mmHg (Fig. 1e). Two months after surgery, the UCVA was 20/30, the IOP was 17 mmHg, and the endothelial cell count was 1,085 cells/mm2.
One month after the surgery on the right eye, PHACO was performed on the left eye without additional treatment to the iris. One day after the surgery on the left eye, the UCVA in that eye was 20/32, and the IOP was 16 mmHg. A slit-lamp examination showed no obvious postoperative reaction. One week after surgery, the UCVA was 20/30 and the IOP was 17 mmHg. One month after surgery, the UCVA was 20/25 and the IOP was 16 mmHg (Fig. 1f). The endothelial cell count was 2,630 cells/mm2 at that time. Two months after surgery, the UCVA was 20/25, the IOP was 14 mmHg, and the endothelial cell count was 3,618 cells/mm2. Although the postoperative corneal endothelial cell density remains normal, the coefficient of variation > 30.
Case 2 involved an 87-year-old female who presented with blurred vision in both eyes for the preceding two years. The patient had suffered from diabetes mellitus for four years, had an allergy to penicillin, had a history of hypertension, and was on antihypertensive and antidiabetic treatments. She had received cataract surgery on her left eye two years earlier and had no history of ocular trauma or heritable ocular disease.
One day after surgery on the right eye, the UCVA was 20/80 and the IOP was 10 mmHg. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy showed moderate corneal oedema, an AC of normal depth, and some fibrillary materials. The pupil was round and undamaged. One week after surgery, the UCVA was 20/63 and the IOP was 13 mmHg. The ocular hyperaemia had disappeared and the mild corneal oedema was improving. One month after surgery, the UCVA was 20/50 and the IOP was 13 mmHg. The endothelial cell count was 1,456 cells/mm2. A slit-lamp examination of the right eye revealed inferior-nasal iridoschisis that was presented from the 4 to 6 o’clock positions and had an AC of normal depth (Fig. 2a).
Case 3 involved a 66-year-old male who was referred to our clinic because of visual loss with congestion and intermittent pain in the left eye for the preceding six months. The patient had no history of ocular trauma or heritable ocular disease.
One month after admission, over which time the eye drops were used, the IOPs were 18 mmHg OD and 32 mmHg OS. The IOPs showed significant fluctuation with medical treatment. Notably, glaucoma surgery will be necessary for this patient in the future. The patient was advised to have frequent ophthalmologic examinations to monitor the IOPs in his eyes and to assess any progression of glaucomatous changes in both eyes.
Iridoschisis is a rare condition that is characterized by partial cleavage of the iris. The anterior layer of the iris stroma, which is similar in appearance to seaweed, becomes curved and floats freely in the anterior chamber (AC). Some portions of the posterior layer become thin and atrophied and is similar in appearance to shredded wheat .
This condition was first described in 1922 by Schmitt, who presented a case with detachment of the anterior iris layer . The term iridoschisis (iris splitting) was first introduced in 1945 by Lowenstein and Foster, who found a deep, parallel cleft between the anterior and posterior stromal layers of the iris . Iridoschisis is most commonly considered to be an age-related atrophy; however, although its causative agent has not yet been identified, cataracts are often an attendant issue .
Cataract operations in patients with iridoschisis require special care. Several methods have been used to stabilize the iris fibres, such as flexible iris hooks, and the use of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) [9–11]. In our first case, after the injection of an OVD into the AC, the iris fibrils were cut by Vannas capsulotomy scissors to prevent the detached iris fibrils in the AC from invading the PHACO tip and the irrigation/aspiration hand piece port. We successfully performed cataract surgery on the right eye without a pupillary device.
In both Cases 1 and 2, we minimized any iris trauma by conducting the operation without an extra pupil-support device. In Case 1, when the UCVA of the left eye was 20/40, we advised the patient to receive cataract surgery sooner than usual with a twofold aim: to prevent blindness caused by the cataract and to avoid additional damage to the ruptured iris tissue from further surgery . One month after surgery, the UCVA of the left eye was 20/25, and a slit-lamp examination did not show any expansion of the scope of the iridoschisis. Based on previous experiences, mechanical restraint of the diseased portion of the iris can be useful for cataract surgery. From our observations, in some conditions, PHACO performed without pupillary devices can also achieve a satisfactory result (even in patients with a wide range of iridoschisis).
Another important aspect of iridoschisis is its frequent association with glaucoma. Glaucoma occurs in more than 50% of iridoschisis cases and is often classified as angle-closure glaucoma . The IOP of Patient 1, who presented with a shredded wheat appearance in all four quadrants, was at a normal level. The IOP of Patient 3 showed significant fluctuations after medical treatment. Scheimpflug images by Sirius indicated that the iridocorneal angle was open in both eyes. Gonioscopy showed that the peripheral AC in the superior area of the right eye had discontinuous synechiae together with pigment deposition. We presumed that the shredded wheat fibres contributed to the angle crowing. However, we speculated that the high IOP was a result of an interaction between the shredded wheat fibres and other factors. In Case 3, the peripheral AC angle recession with accompanying pigment deposition was a prominent feature. Consequently, glaucoma surgery will be necessary in the future. Therefore, high IOP may be the joint effect of either split iris tissue, synechiae, or plateau iris configuration, which may be the main causes of primary angle-closure glaucoma in patients with iridoschisis.
Furthermore, iridoschisis was previously reported to be associated with corneal endothelial decompensation, which is an uncommon complication. However, several cases of corneal decompensation secondary to iridoschisis have been reported [13–15]. Mechanical iridocorneal contact was thought to cause corneal endothelial decompensation . The preoperative corneal endothelial cell densities of our cases were within normal limits. However, in Case 1, the endothelial cell count was 1,085 cells/mm2 for OD and 3,618 cells/mm2 for OS two months after surgery. Due to the relatively long operation process required to remove the freely floating iris fibrils in the aqueous humour of the right eye, corneal oedema was observed in the early stage after surgery, and we found no iris/cornea contact with our postoperative slit-lamp microscope inspection. Therefore, surgery rather than iridocorneal mechanical contact was the main cause of the postoperative decrease in corneal endothelial cells.
The differential diagnosis for iridoschisis includes the neurocristopathy of the iris and cornea (Axenfeld-Reiger [AR] syndrome) and iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome. AR syndrome is a rare, non-progressive congenital anomaly that presents at birth. Bilateral changes have been found in both AR syndrome and iridoschisis. Moreover, AR syndrome is characterized by anterior displacement of Schwalbe’s line and hypoplasia of the iris stroma with filaments connected to an abnormal peripheral cornea. In contrast to ICE syndrome, bilateral onset and old-age onset are two important features of iridoschisis. ICE syndrome is more frequent in young adults, especially in females aged 30 to 40 years, and is usually unilaterally involved. The clinical features of ICE syndrome include corectopia or polyconic projection, areas of atrophy, full-thickness hole(s), and nodules in the iris, endothelial dystrophy, identification of ICE cells by confocal microscopy, corneal oedema, and peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) of the AC angle. The iris tissue is usually atrophic rather than split and is characterized by marked iris atrophy and hole(s) formation. The iris tissue vanishes without previous signs due to tissue ischaemia . By contrast, normal perfusion of blood vessels has been reported in patients with iridoschisis . The iris stroma, which shows splitting instead of hole formation, is pronounced and similar to the observations in Scheimpflug image by Sirius. Indentation gonioscopy shows that the PAS extends to the Schwalbe’s line in patients with ICE. The pupil may be ectopic and displaced towards the PAS. Specular microscopy has also revealed abnormal corneal endothelial cells or so-called “ICE cells.” In these cases, the difference between iridoschisis and iris atrophy can be determined easily by ultrasound biomicroscope (UBM) and Scheimpflug image by Sirius. In patients with iridoschisis, as the separation of the iris stroma and loosening of the tissue occurs, the distance between the anterior and posterior layers increases and shows an irregular reflection . A narrow AC and the discontinuous iris pigment epithelium can also be clearly detected. Furthermore, UBM is the optimal method for diagnosing plateau iris syndrome because it enables functional testing of both the iris and the ciliary body .
In summary, an iridoschisis diagnosis should made based on the results of UBM and Scheimpflug image by Sirius. With the use of UBM and Scheimpflug image, iridoschisis can be easily distinguished from other anomalous iris diseases.
Iridoschisis is an age-related condition that is usually accompanied by cataracts, secondary glaucoma, or corneal endothelial decompensation. Patients with iridoschisis that is complicated by cataracts should receive cataract surgery sooner than usual to achieve better outcomes. High IOP in these patients may be due to the joint effect of multiple factors rather than only the scope of the iridoschisis. Finally, because surgery may cause a severe decrease in postoperative corneal endothelial cells and various complications, cataract operations in patients with iridoschisis require special care.
Anterior chamber depth
Best corrected visual acuity
Central corneal thickness
Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome
Ophthalmic viscosurgical device
Peripheral anterior synechiaes
Rapid plasma reagin
Uncorrected visual acuity
No funding was received by any of the authors in the writing of this manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data supporting our findings are provided in the manuscript.
YC drafted the manuscript, participated in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and reviewed the literature. YQ participated in the acquisition of data. PL conceived and designed the study, participated in the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Written informed consents were obtained for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by ethics committee board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. All patients were provided a written informed consent for their participation in the study and for the surgical procedure. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the editor of this journal.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Lowenstein A, Foster J. Iridoschisis with multiple rupture of stromal threads. Br J Ophthamol. 1945;29:277–82. PMID: 18170119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schoneveld PG, Pesudovs K. Iridoschisis. Clin Exp Optom. 1999;82:29–33. PMID: 12482307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Porteous A, Low S, Younis S, Bloom P. Lens extraction and intraocular lens implant to manage iridoschisis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2015;43:82-3. PMID:24827832.
- Salmon JF, Murray AD. The association of iridoschisis and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Eye. 1992;6:267–72. PMID: 25728064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal S, Agrawal J, Agrawal TP. Iridoschisis associated with lens subluxation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:2044–6. PMID: 15342034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foss AJE, Hykin PG, Benjamin L. Interstitial Keratitis and iridoschisis in congentialsyphilis. J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1992;12:167–70. PMID: 1401161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee EJ, Lee JH, Hyon JY, Kim MK, Wee WR. A case of cataract surgery without pupillary device in the eye with iridoschisis. Kor J Ophthalmol. 2008;22:58–62. PMID: 18323708.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt A. Detachment of the anterior half of the iris plane. Klin Monatsbl Angenheilkd. 1922;68:214–5.Google Scholar
- Auffarth GU, Reuland AJ, Hegar T, Völcker HE. Cataract surgery in eyes with iridoschisis using the perfect pupil iris extension system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:1877–80. PMID: 16338554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith GT, Liu CS. Flexible iris hooks for phacoemulsification in patients with iridoschisis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1277–80. PMID:11020611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rozenberg I, Seabra FP. Avoiding iris trauma from phacoemulsification in eyes with iridoschisis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:741–5. PMID: 15093633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gogaki E, Tsolaki F, Tiganita S, Skatharoudi C, Balatsoukas D. Iridoschisis: case report and review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:381–4. PMID: 21499560.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Weseley AC, Freeman WR. Iridoschisis and the corneal endothelium. Ann Ophthalmol. 1983;15:955–9. PMID: 6651136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srinvasan S, Batterbury M, Hiscott P. Bullous keraopathy and cornal decompensation secondary to iridoschisis: a clinicopathological report. Cornea. 2005;24:867–9. PMID: 16160507.Google Scholar
- Wang HB, Hu YX, Feng X. Corneal endothelial decompensation secondary to iridoschisis in degenerative myopic eyes: a case report. Inl J Ophthalmol. 2002;5:116–8. PMID: 22553768.Google Scholar
- Sacchetti M, Mantelli F, Marenco M, Macchi L, Ambrosio O, Rama P. Diagnosis and management of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:763093. PMID: 26451377.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carnevalini A, Menchini U, Bandello F, Scialdone A, Brancato R. Fluoroiridographic aspects of iridoschisis. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1988;11:329–32. PMID: 3171099.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paniagua L, Bande MF, Rodríguez-Ares MT, Piñeiro A. A presentation of iridoschisis with plateau iris: an imaging study. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98:290–1. PMID: 25728064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nolan W. Anterior segment imaging: ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19:115–21. PMID: 18301284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar