Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery after penetrating keratoplasty: a case report

BMC OphthalmologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:100

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0496-1

Received: 11 March 2017

Accepted: 15 June 2017

Published: 24 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Cataract surgery after penetratingkeratoplasty (PKP) is often challenging due to changes in the integrity of the cornea caused by PKP. For example, corneal endothelial cell (CEC) loss and corneal edema commonly occur after traditional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients that previously had successful PKP. Recent studies have reported that femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) significantly reduces the need for ultrasound energy minimizing mechanical damage to the cornea and results in a reduction of CEC loss and corneal edema.

Case presentation

We report a case in which FLACS was used in a patient with previous PKP.

Conclusion

This case supports the suggestion that the use of the femtosecond laser improves the surgical outcome of cataract surgery after PKP. This improvement may be result of the precise incision, controlled capsulorhexis, and reduced lens fragmentation experienced with the femtosecond laser which helps to reduce potential complications of cataract surgery after PKP.

Keywords

Femtosecond Cataract Corneal Transplantation

Background

Previous studies report that 44–64% of patients develop cataracts within five years of PKP. Cataract surgery after PKP is often challenging due to changes in corneal integrity induced by PKP. CEC loss and corneal edema often occur after traditional phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients that had previous successful PKP [1]. The mean annual rate of endothelial cell loss from 10 to 15 years after surgery was 0.2 +/− 5.7% [2].

Corneal distortion, irrigation solution turbulence, instrument-related mechanical trauma, nuclear fragments, IOL contact, and free oxygen radicals can cause corneal damage during cataract surgery. Several preoperative and intraoperative parameters (high nucleus grade, advanced age, long phaco time, high ultrasound energy, short axial length, and surgical skill) are associated with an increased risk of endothelial cell damage after phacoemulsification [3]. Recent studies had shown that the use of FLACS significantly reduces the need for ultrasound energy minimizing mechanical damage to the cornea and results in a reduction of CEC loss and corneal edema [4].

Case presentation

A male patient of 61-years that had 7.0 mm diameter PKP performed in his left eye two years ago. His best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at distance in the left was light perception. Slit lamp examination showed a corneal graft transparency and a hard cataract with a 3 mm centered white anterior lens capsule calcification (Fig. 1). Due to the hardness of cataract in this case, the IOL-Master could not assess the axial length (AL) and an A-Scan (TOMEY, AL2000, Japan) was used to assess AL. Keratometry was assessed using the auto-refractometer (Topcon, KR8800, Japan).IOL power was calculated using the SRK/T formulas, using the A-Scan software. The LenSx laser system (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) was used to perform this surgery. Based on this examination, a 5.0 mm capsulotomy diameter was selected. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) showed a bulge in the anterior lens capsule calcification of the central area. An AS-OCT-guided 2.2 mm corneal incision was created (Fig. 2a). Cylinder and chop pattern was used for lens fragmentation (Fig. 2b). After completion of the laser procedure, the patient was moved to the operating room. The surgery was completed with a standard phacoemulsification procedure using the Infiniti Vision System. The Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) was used to assess phacoemulsification time and phacoemulsification power. The CDE was 8.69, the total surgical time was 16 mins., (from femtosecond laser to watertight), and the volume of irrigating solution used was 92 ml. A 23D Acrysof SN60WF intraocular lens(IOL) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) was implanted.
Fig. 1

A preoperative slitlamp image showing a corneal graft transparency and a hard cataract with a 3 mm centered white anterior lens capsule calcification

Fig. 2

a AS-OCT image depicts the architecture of clear corneal incision. The white arrow indicates the corneal graft. The red arrow indicates corneal bed. b A 5.0 mm capsulotomy diameter was selected. The AS-OCT indicated that the anterior lens capsule calcification of the central areas had a bulge

On postoperative day 1, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/40 with a transparent cornea and a well-centered IOL with a 360-degree capsule overlap (Fig. 3). The postoperative UCVA improved to 20/25 after one month. Subjective refraction was stable at 0.75 D sphere and 2.00 D cylinder at the three month follow up. The specular microscope (Topcon, SP2000P,Japan) was used to measure CEC numbers. Preoperative CEC numbers were 1947 cells/mm2, 1792 cells/mm2 immediately after surgery, 1628 cells/mm2 at one month and 1517 cells/mm2 at three months.
Fig. 3

A postoperative slitlamp image showing a transparent cornea and a well-centered IOL

Discussion and conclusions

The three critical steps for successful cataract surgery after PKP areobtaining a central continuous capsular capsulotomy, minimizing ultrasound energy and ensuring a closed incision. Manual capsulorhexis is a significant challenge, such as in this case, when an intumescent cataract is present with a 3 mm centered white anterior capsule. Many studies report a decreased rate of anterior capsule tears in FLACS compared to manual phacoemulsification cataract surgery [57]. Additionally, the creation of a precise, safe, and reproducible capsulotomy is a prerequisite for successful cataract surgery and IOL implantation. Compared to manual capsulorhexis [8], the femtosecond laser has been shown to create a particularly well-shaped and reproducible capsulotomy geometry and circularity [9]. In this case, intraoperative AS-OCT of LenSx was able to image through white opacities of the lens anterior capsule calcifications in advanced cataracts [10]. The femtosecond laser capsulotomy diameter is highly controlled. In this case, the diameter was set to 5 mm, larger than the 3 mm central area of the anterior lens capsule calcification. Capsulotomies performed by the femtosecond laser ensures the safety of intraoperative nucleus chopping and provides accurate location of the IOL [11]. Dick, et al. compared the surgical outcome of patients who underwent the standard manual phacoemulsification versus FLACS. They report that the FLACS group had significantly less capsular bag shrinkage than the standard group at one, two, and three months, with a mean difference of 0.33 ± 0.25 mm at three months [12]. Early stabilization of the capsular bag diameter leads to more predictable effective lens position, IOL power calculations, and refractive outcomes.

Normal function of corneal endothelial cells is essential for maintaining corneal transparency [13, 14]. Cataract surgery after corneal transplant must minimize endothelial cell damage as the transplant has fewer endothelial cells compared to normal corneas. In our case, the preoperative of CEC numbers were 1947 cells/mm2 and a decrease in endothelial cell numbers occurred after phacoemulsification [15]. Several studies [1618] report a direct relationship between endothelial cell loss and ultrasound power and time. Endothelial cell loss related to ultrasound use is markedly higher in cornea graft than in normal corneas [19]. Furthermore, the cataract nucleus hardness in this case was a grade IV .To perform this procedure with traditional phacoemulsification would require more energy and significantly decrease postoperative CEC numbers. Using extra capsular cataract extraction (ECCE) causes less endothelial cell loss compared to phacoemulsification [17], but often induces an astigmatism which leads to poor vision. Femtosecond laser uses ultra short pulses of near infrared light to disrupt tissue with micron precision, this minimizing tissue damage [20]. Lens fragmentation, induced by the femtosecond laser, significantly reduces endothelial cell damage by minimizing the amount of potentially injurious ultrasound energy required to emulsify the lens. Furthermore, laser energy is focused on the capsular bag and limits exposure to the endothelium [21]. Here, we report that our patient had postoperative CEC numbers of 1517 cells/mm2 at the three-month follow up.

The thickness of the corneal graft and corneal bed are often not the same which leading to poor incision architecture during traditional phacoemulsification. Femtosecond laser improves incision architecture by increasing the precision and reducing mechanical and thermal stress at the incision site [22]. In our case, the corneal incision was made by femtosecond laser and guided by AS-OCT.

In conclusion, the use of femtosecond laser allows precise incisions, controlled capsulorhexis and reduces the amount of ultrasound energy required for lens removal. This technique reduces potential complications in cataract surgery after PKP and improves visual recovery and refractive results.

Abbreviations

AC-OCT: 

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography

BCVA: 

best corrected visual acuity

CEC: 

corneal endothelial cell

FLACS: 

femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

IOL: 

intraocular lens

PKP: 

penetratingkeratoplasty

UCVA: 

uncorrected visual acuity

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by Science Research Foundation of Aier Eye Hospital Group (AM142D17, AF1602D1, AF1602D2), Health and Family Planning Commission of Hubei Municipality(WJ2017M205).

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting our findings are contained within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

All authors conceived of and designed the experimental protocol. DC and SW collected the data. All authors were involved in the analysis. DC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DC and YW reviewed and revised the manuscript and produced the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report accompanying images. A copy of written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present case report was approved by the ethics committee of Wuhan Aier Eye hospital.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Wuhan Aier Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group
(2)
Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University
(3)
Ningbo Aier Guangming Eye Hospital, Aier Eye Hospital Group

References

  1. Acar BT, Utine CA, Acar S, Ciftci F. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in eyes with previous penetrating keratoplasty, previous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, or no previous surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:2013–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertelmann E, Pleyer U, Rieck P. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss post-keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006;84:766–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho YK, Chang HS, Kim MS. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: comparison in different anterior chamber depth groups. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24:10–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. He L, Sheehy K, Culbertson W. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011;22:43–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roberts TV, Lawless M, Sutton G, Hodge C. Anterior capsule integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1109–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Scott WJ. Re: Abell et al.: anterior capsulotomy integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (ophthalmology 2014;121:17–24). Ophthalmology. 2014 121:e35–6.Google Scholar
  7. Abell RG, Davies PE, Phelan D, Goemann K, McPherson ZE, Vote BJ. Anterior capsulotomy integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dick HB, Gerste RD, Schultz T, Waring GO. Capsulotomy or capsulorhexis in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1442.Google Scholar
  9. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Calienno R, et al. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of capsulorhexis in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1581–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:1053–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Grewal DS, Schultz T, Basti S, Dick HB. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery--current status and future directions. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016;61:103–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dick HB, Conrad-Hengerer I, Schultz T. Intraindividual capsular bag shrinkage comparing standard and laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:228–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dikstein S, Maurice DM. The metabolic basis to the fluid pump in the cornea. J Physiol. 1972;221:29–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. MAURICE DM. The structure and transparency of the cornea. J Physiol. 1957;136:263–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Bourne RR, Minassian DC, Dart JK, Rosen P, Kaushal S, Wingate N. Effect of cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium: modern phacoemulsification compared with extracapsular cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:679–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dick HB, Kohnen T, Jacobi FK, Jacobi KW. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:63–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhou HW, Xie LX. Effects of Cataract Surgery on Endothelium in Transplanted Corneal Grafts: Comparison of Extracapsular Cataract Extraction and Phacoemulsification for Complicated Cataract after Penetrating Keratoplasty. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 129:2096–101.Google Scholar
  18. Walkow T, Anders N, Klebe S. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: relation to preoperative and intraoperative parameters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:727–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim EC, Kim MS. A comparison of endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in penetrating keratoplasty patients and normal patients. Cornea. 2010;29:510–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sugar A. Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:246–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abell RG, Kerr NM, Howie AR, Mustaffa KMA, Allen PL, Vote BJ. Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1777–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Mastropasqua A, et al. Femtosecond laser versus manual clear corneal incision in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:27–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017