Table 1 Results of the systematic review
Author | Study Type (Grade) | Lens | Unit Measurement | N (eyes) | Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | Postoperative | P | |||||
De Silva (2006) [7] | Observational (IIb) | Human Optics MicroSil 6116TU | LogMAR–6 months | 21 | 0.55 ± 0.34 | 0.32 ± 0.24 | NR |
Entabi (2011) [8] | Observational (IIb) | Rayner T-Flex 623T | LogMAR–4 months | 33 | – | 0.28 ± 0.23 | NR |
Kersey (2007) [9] | Observational (IIb) | Human Optics MicroSil 6116TU | LogMAR–9-19 months | 7 | 1.31 ± 0.65 | 0.39 ± 1.15 | NR |
Kim (2010) [10] | Observational (IIb) | AcrySof Toric | LogMAR–13.3 months (mean) | 30 | 0.87 ± 0.67 | 0.33 ± 0.18 | <0.05 |
Koshy (2010) [11] | Observational (IIb) | AcrySof Toric SN60TT | LogMAR–6 months | 30 | – | 0.2 | NR |
Lane (2009) [12] | Prospective (IIb) | AcrySof Toric | LogMAR–6 months | 40 | – | −0.07 | NR |
Leyland (2001) [13] | Observational (IIb) | Staar Toric | LogMAR–8 weeks | 22 | 1.45 ± 0.64 | 0.27 ± 0.25 | NR |
Mendicute (2009) [14] | RCT (Ib) | AcrySof Toric SN60T3, SN60T4, SN60T5 | LogMAR–3 months | 40 | – | 0.11 ± 0.15 | NR |
Mendicute (2008) [15] | Observational (IIb) | AcrySof Toric SN60T3, SN60T4, SN60T5 | LogMAR–3 months | 30 | – | 0.16 ± 0.18 | NR |
Mingo-Botin (2010) [16] | RCT (Ib) | AcrySof Toric | LogMAR–3 months | 40 | 0.72 ± 0.26 | 0.13 ± 0.10 | NR |
Ruhswurm (2000) [17] | Retrospective observational (IIb) | Staar Toric AA4203T | Decimal–3-62.8 months | 37 | – | 0.61 ± 0.29 (0.21LogMAR) | NR |