Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of phacotrabeculectomy versus phacocanaloplasty in the treatment of patients with concomitant cataract and glaucoma

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jimmy Lai
7 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dexter Yu lung LEUNG
11 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthias Christian Grieshaber
9 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Juliane Matlach
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthias Christian Grieshaber
23 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jimmy Lai
12 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dexter Yu lung LEUNG
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
29 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2415-13-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement