Theoretical and empirical dimensions of the Aberdeen Glaucoma Questionnaire: a cross sectional survey and principal component analysis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Haogang Zhu|
|17 Jun 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jyoti Khadka|
|17 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Prior|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jyoti Khadka|
|12 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Haogang Zhu|
|6 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Prior|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|22 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2415-13-72|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.