Essential infantile esotropia: postoperative motor outcomes and inferential analysis of strabismus surgery

BMC Ophthalmology

Table 1 Different surgical approaches

Surgery	n (%)	Age, mean ± std. dev. (min – max) at 1^stsurgery; years
Type 1: OO rec MR	6
Type 2: OO rec MR + res LR	29 (5.0)	2.8 ± 0.5 (2–4)
Type 3: OO rec MR + OO res LR	71 (12.4)	2.6 ± 0.7 (1–4)
Type 4: OO rec MR + OO res LR + rec conj	29 (5.0)	2.9 ± 0.6 (2–4)
Type 5: OO rec MR + rec-ap IO	19 (3.3)	2.5 ± 0.5 (2–3)
Type 6: OO rec MR + OO res LR + rec-ap IO	156 (27.1)	2.9 ± 0.6 (1–4)
Type 7: OO rec MR + OO res LR + rec conj + rec-ap IO	272 (47.2)	2.5 ± 0.7 (1–4)
Total	576 (100)	2.7 ± 0.7 (1–4)

Type 1 (OO rec MR) patients were excluded from the data analysis, due to too small sample for statistical evaluation.

ISSN: 1471-2415