Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of multivariate analysis through logistic regression models for enhancement criteria of URE and UREN

From: Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population

  URE OR (IC 95%) P value UREN OR (IC 95%) P value
Gender     
 Man 0.71 (0.61 – 0.83) < 0.001 0.67 (0.54 – 0.83) < 0.001
 Woman 1   1  
Age     
 1 to 9 0.14 (0.08 – 0.24) < 0.001 0.02 (0.005 – 0.8) < 0.001
 10 to 19 0.23 (0.16 – 0.34) < 0.001 0.15 (0.09 – 0.24) < 0.001
 20 to 29 0.44 (0.31 – 0.61) 0.03 0.4 (0.27 – 0.61) 0.16
 30 to 39 0.42 (0.30 – 0.58) 0.009 0.34 (0.22 – 0.51) 0.83
 40 to 49 0.61 (0.46 – 0.82) 0.21 0.40 (0.27 – 0.59) 0.15
 50 to 59 1.21 (0.92 – 1.59) < 0.001 0.71 (0.50 – 1.00) < 0.001
 60 to 69 1.77 (1.34 – 2.34) <0.001 1.06 (0.75 – 1.48) < 0.001
 70 or + 1   1  
Background     
 No background 1.02 (0.87 – 1.20) 0.77 0.88 (0.71 – 1.10) 0.27
 Background 1   1  
Astigmatism axis     
 Vertical 1   1  
 Horizontal 1.01 (0.84 – 1.22) 0.34 0.95 (0.74 – 1.21) 0.48
Myopia     
 Yes 1   1  
 No 0.19 (0.15 – 0.24) < 0.001 0.1 (0.07 – 0.14) < 0.001
Hyperopia     
 Yes 1   1  
 No 0.34 (0.28 – 0.42) < 0.001 0.24 (0.17 – 0.34) < 0.001
Astigmatism     
 Yes 1   1  
 No 0.6 (0.51 – 0.71) < 0.001 0.83 (0.66 – 1.06) 0.13
Anisometropia     
 Yes 1   1  
 No 1.04 (0.85 – 1.26) 0.67 0.56 (0.44 – 0.70) < 0.001