Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of multivariate analysis through logistic regression models for enhancement criteria of URE and UREN

From: Influence of uncorrected refractive error and unmet refractive error on visual impairment in a Brazilian population

 

URE OR (IC 95%)

P value

UREN OR (IC 95%)

P value

Gender

    

 Man

0.71 (0.61 – 0.83)

< 0.001

0.67 (0.54 – 0.83)

< 0.001

 Woman

1

 

1

 

Age

    

 1 to 9

0.14 (0.08 – 0.24)

< 0.001

0.02 (0.005 – 0.8)

< 0.001

 10 to 19

0.23 (0.16 – 0.34)

< 0.001

0.15 (0.09 – 0.24)

< 0.001

 20 to 29

0.44 (0.31 – 0.61)

0.03

0.4 (0.27 – 0.61)

0.16

 30 to 39

0.42 (0.30 – 0.58)

0.009

0.34 (0.22 – 0.51)

0.83

 40 to 49

0.61 (0.46 – 0.82)

0.21

0.40 (0.27 – 0.59)

0.15

 50 to 59

1.21 (0.92 – 1.59)

< 0.001

0.71 (0.50 – 1.00)

< 0.001

 60 to 69

1.77 (1.34 – 2.34)

<0.001

1.06 (0.75 – 1.48)

< 0.001

 70 or +

1

 

1

 

Background

    

 No background

1.02 (0.87 – 1.20)

0.77

0.88 (0.71 – 1.10)

0.27

 Background

1

 

1

 

Astigmatism axis

    

 Vertical

1

 

1

 

 Horizontal

1.01 (0.84 – 1.22)

0.34

0.95 (0.74 – 1.21)

0.48

Myopia

    

 Yes

1

 

1

 

 No

0.19 (0.15 – 0.24)

< 0.001

0.1 (0.07 – 0.14)

< 0.001

Hyperopia

    

 Yes

1

 

1

 

 No

0.34 (0.28 – 0.42)

< 0.001

0.24 (0.17 – 0.34)

< 0.001

Astigmatism

    

 Yes

1

 

1

 

 No

0.6 (0.51 – 0.71)

< 0.001

0.83 (0.66 – 1.06)

0.13

Anisometropia

    

 Yes

1

 

1

 

 No

1.04 (0.85 – 1.26)

0.67

0.56 (0.44 – 0.70)

< 0.001