Skip to main content

Table 3 Model fitting results of the multilevel analyses for the domains communication with ophthalmologist, communication with nurses, and communication about medication and for the global rating of ophthalmologist, nurses and hospitals (standard errors added in parentheses)

From: Patients' experiences with quality of hospital care: the Consumer Quality Index Cataract Questionnaire

Outcome variable

intercept

β age1

β gender1

β education1

β health1

β% drops

Var patients

Var hospital

ICC2

Domain ophthalmologist (N = 3942)

         

Model 1

3.640 (0.014)*

-

-

-

-

-

0.246 (0.006)*

0.006 (0.002)*

0.02

Model 2

3.687 (0.031)*

-0.005 (0.016)

0.017 (0.016)

-0.031 (0.017)

-0.102 (0.017)*

0.000 (0.000)

0.243 (0.006)*

0.007 (0.002)*

0.03

Domain nurses (N = 3925)

         

Model 1

3.726 (0.009)*

-

-

-

-

-

0.196 (0.004)*

0.002 (0.001)

n.c.

Model 2

3.767 (0.024)*

-0.020 (0.014)

0.005 (0.015)

-0.016 (0.015)

-0.089 (0.015)*

0.000 (0.000)

0.194 (0.004)*

0.002 (0.001)

n.c

Domain medication (N = 3887)

         

Model 1

2.670 (0.033)*

-

-

-

-

-

1.246 (0.028)*

0.038 (0.011)*

0.03

Model 2

3.015 (0.070)*

-0.214 (0.036)*

-0.035 (0.037)

-0.166 (0.039)*

-0.020 (0.039)

-0.002 (0.001)*

1.232 (0.028)*

0.031 (0.010)*

0.02

Rating ophthalmologist (N = 3940)

         

Model 1

8.791 (0.039)*

-

-

-

-

-

2.124 (0.048)*

0.046 (0.015)*

0.02

Model 2

8.894 (0.088)*

0.104 (0.047)*

0.013 (0.048)

-0.106 (0.051)

-0.308 (0.051)*

0.000 (0.001)

2.101 (0.048)*

0.045 (0.015)*

0.02

Rating nurses (N = 3910)

         

Model 1

8.916 (0.027)*

-

-

-

-

-

1.466 (0.033)*

0.016 (0.007)*

0.01

Model 2

8.943 (0.065)*

0.084 (0.039)*

0.004 (0.040)

-0.086 (0.042)

-0.219 (0.043)*

0.001 (0.001)

1.455 (0.033)*

0.011 (0.006)

n.c

Rating hospital (N = 3970)

         

Model 1

8.775 (0.036)*

-

-

-

-

-

1.730 (0.039)*

0.041 (0.013)*

0.02

Model 2

8.987 (0.080)*

0.064 (0.042)*

-0.040 (0.043)

-0.127 (0.045)*

-0.306 (0.046)*

-0.001 (0.001)

1.709 (0.039)*

0.037 (0.013)*

0.02

  1. *p < 0.05
  2. 1Reference group age = younger than 75; reference group gender = males; reference group education = low education; reference group health = good health
  3. 2ICC (intra-class correlation) = Var hospital/(Var patients + Var hospital)
  4. n.c. = not calculated. The variance explained by the hospital level is not significant and, therefore, the ICC is not calculated.