Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The importance of central corneal thickness measurements and decision making in general ophthalmology clinics: a masked observational study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 May 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Doughty
28 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ashish A Patwardhan
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarek Saleh
31 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Murdoch
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ashish A Patwardhan
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tarek Saleh
15 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Fraser
22 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ashish A Patwardhan
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
6 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ashish A Patwardhan
Resubmission - Version 6
6 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ashish A Patwardhan
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
20 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2415-8-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement