Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Which quality of life score is best for glaucoma patients and why?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jun 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Wormald
28 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Scott Fraser
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Scott Fraser
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Wormald
13 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Scott Fraser
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Scott Fraser
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
23 Jan 2008 Editorially accepted
23 Jan 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2415-8-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement