Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison between tested groups for anatomical outcome (redetachment rate)

From: Anatomical success rate of pars plana vitrectomy for treatment of complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Groups

Anatomical outcome (Redetachment rate %)

G1 (Phakic + gas; n = 46) vs G2 (Pseudophakic + gas; n = 43)

0% vs 4.7%; (p = 0.15)

G3 (Phakic + SO; n = 13) vs G4 (Pseudophakic + SO; n = 15)

23.1% vs 13.3%; (p = 0.5)

G1 (Phakic + gas; n = 46) vs G3 (Phakic + SO; n = 13)

0% vs 23.1%; (p = 0.001*)

G2 (Pseudophakic + gas; n = 43) vs G4 (Pseudophakic + SO; n = 15)

4.7% vs 13.3%; (p = 0.26)

G1-G4

p = 0.011*

  1. *p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test