Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the Axial Length between Different Factors by adjusting Age of EL

From: Distribution of axial length in Chinese congenital ectopia lentis patients: a retrospective study

Subgroups

Axial length (mean ± SD) (Number of subjects)

0-3y

3–6 y

6–12 y

12–18 y

Total

Marfan syndrome

 With Marfan syndrome

-(0)

24.9 ± 2.1(19)

25.4 ± 2.3(34)

26.8 ± 2.4(36)

25.8 ± 2.4(89)

 non-Marfan syndrome

24.8 ± 1.1(5)

24.3 ± 2.1(57)

24.5 ± 2.4(66)

26.1 ± 2.7(30)

24.7 ± 2.4(158)

p

-

0.58

0.95

0.53

0.69

Sex

 Male

24.8 ± 1.2(3)

24.6 ± 2.1(55)

24.9 ± 2.2(69)

27.0 ± 2.7(46)

25.4 ± 2.5(173)

 Female

25.0 ± 1.3(2)

23.9 ± 2.2(21)

24.5 ± 2.7(31)

25.1 ± 1.7(20)

24.5 ± 2.3(74)

p

0.80

0.53

0.47

0.02*

0.26

Unilateral EL patients

 Effected eye

24.1(1)

24.4 ± 2.2(26)

24.5 ± 2.4(37)

26.8 ± 2.4(39)

25.2 ± 2.5(103)

 Fellow eye

21.6(1)

24.9 ± 2.4(26)

25.1 ± 2.4(37)

26.5 ± 2.2(39)

25.7 ± 2.5(103)

p

-

0.01*

0.00*

0.65

0.00*

  1. Abbreviations: EL = ectopia lentis
  2. *p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant