Skip to main content

Table 1 A list of 32 toric intraocular lenses (TIOL) implanted over a 10 months period

From: Real-world refractive outcomes of toric intraocular lens implantation in a United Kingdom National Health Service setting

ID

Age (yr)

Eye

Co-morbidity

IOL type

IOL power (D)

Pre-op BCVA

Post-op UVA

1

67

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

20.0

0.30

0.30

2

61

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

14.0

0.30

0.00

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

14.0

0.50

0.10

3a

56

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

12.0

0.30

0.00

4

76

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

18.0

0.50

0.18

5

77

Lb

 

Tecnis ZCT 150

20.0

0.30

0.00

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

19.0

0.60

0.18

6

67

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

16.5

0.30

0.00

L

ERM

Tecnis ZCT 400

13.5

0.50

0.48

7a

49

R

Vitrectomised

Tecnis ZCT 300

19.5

0.50

0.30

8

67

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

16.5

0.30

0.10

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

11.0

0.20

0.00

9

78

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 300

20.5

0.50

0.30

10

82

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

23.5

0.00

0.00

11

82

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

24.5

0.20

0.18

12

65

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

17.5

0.30

0.00

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

11.0

0.30

0.18

13

41

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

26.5

2.00

0.18

L

Amblyopia

Tecnis ZCT 400

27.5

1.00

0.18

14

60

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

26.0

0.00

0.30

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

26.5

0.30

0.30

15

80

R

Amblyopia

Tecnis ZCT 400

27.0

0.60

0.30

16

21

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 300

22.5

0.48

0.00

17

78

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 225

31.0

0.18

0.18

18

85

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

21.0

0.30

0.18

19

82

R

 

Tecnis ZCT 400

17.5

0.30

0.30

20

86

L

 

Tecnis ZCT 300

23.5

0.30

0.10

21

53

R

Previous LASIK & PCRI

AcrySof SN60 T8

23.0

0.18

0.10

L

AcrySof SN60 T8

22.0

0.30

0.10

22

74

L

 

Rayner T-flex 623

18.0

0.48

0.18

23

72

L

 

Rayner T-flex 623

16.0

0.30

0.18

24

74

L

Corneal scar

Rayner T-flex 623

16.5

0.30

0.18

  1. aIndicate cases complicated by TIOL rotation, which were corrected surgically
  2. bThe left eye of patient 5 received a low powered toric IOL (Tecnis ZCT 150) to correct a ΔK of 1.41 D (which is lower than the ΔK > 2.00 D inclusion criteria). This was at the clinician’s discretion as the patient had already received a higher powered toric IOL in the fellow eye