Table 5 Literature studies of myopic astigmatic correction
Author (year) | Technique | Eyes (n) | Follow-up (months) | Preoperative cylinder Mean ± SD (range) | Postoperative cylinder Mean ± SD (range) | Within 0.50D (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schallhorn [17] (2015) | W-LASIK | 611 | 3 | −2.76 ± 0.81 (− 2.00 to −6.00) | −0.37 ± 0.38 (− 2.00 to 0.00) | 79.10% |
Stojanovic [12] (2013) | TransPRK | 117 | 12 | −0.77 ± 0.65 (−4.50 to 0.00) | / | 94.00% |
Adib [5] (2016) | TransPRK | 146 | 18 | −1.19 ± 0.99 | −0.29 ± 0.21 | 97.26% |
Zhang J [18] (2015) | SMILE | 98 | 12 | −0.90 ± 0.68 (− 0.25 to − 2.75) | −0.20 ± 0.27 | 95.92% |
AI-Zeraid [19] (2016) | W-LASIK | 23 | 6 | −3.22 ± 0.59 (− 2.50 to − 4.50) | −0.72 ± 0.46 | 39% |
Ali-MA [8] (2014) | FLEx | 58 | 6 | − 0.97 ± 0.54 (− 0.5 to − 2.75) | −0.26 ± 0.37 (− 1.00 to 0.00) | 86% |
Chan [11] (2015) | SMILE | 54 | 3 | −1.08 ± 0.71 | −0.243 ± 0.316 | 87% |
Current study | TransPRK | 47 | 6 | −1.11 ± 0.40 (−0.75 to − 2.25) | − 0.33 ± 0.25 (− 1.25 to 0.00) | 93.6% |