Skip to main content

Table 2 Postoperative visual acuity and refractive errors

From: Comparison between Wavefront-optimized and corneal Wavefront-guided Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in moderate to high astigmatism

 

WFO Trans-PRK

CWFG Trans-PRK

P value

logMAR UDVA

−0.07 ± 0.08 (− 0.18 to 0.10)

−0.07 ± 0.07 (− 0.18 to 0.05)

.954

logMAR CDVA

−0.08 ± 0.08 (− 0.18 to 0.10)

−0.09 ± 0.07 (− 0.18 to 0.05)

.896

Sphere (D)

0.35 ± 0.27 (− 0.12 to 1.00)

0.32 ± 0.28 (− 0.25 to 1.00)

.455

Cylindrical (D)

−0.33 ± 0.24 (− 1.00 to 0.00)

−0.27 ± 0.19 (− 0.75 to 0.00)

.076

SE (D)

0.19 ± 0.26 (− 0.38 to 0.88)

0.19 ± 0.27 (− 0.38 to 0.88)

.953

  1. Comparison of postoperative visual acuity and refractive errors between patients who underwent WFO Trans-PRK and those who underwent CWFG Trans-PRK
  2. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation (range)
  3. WFO wavefront-optimized, CWFG corneal wavefront-guided, Trans-PRK transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy, logMAR logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, UDVA uncorrected distance visual acuity, SE spherical equivalent
Back to article page

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us