Skip to main content

Table 5 Summary and meta-analysis of recent studies on myopia and high myopia prevalence among young adults

From: The increasing prevalence of myopia and high myopia among high school students in Fenghua city, eastern China: a 15-year population-based survey

Author (Year)

Location

Population-based?

N

Refraction

method

Myopia

definition

Mean

Age

Prevalence (%)

Ref

Myopia

High myopia

Jung (2012)

Seoul, Korea

Noa

23,616

CAR

< −0.5D

19

96.5

21.61

Ref 8

Sun (2012)

Shanghai, China

Yes

5083

NCAR

< − 0.5D

20

95.5

19.5

Ref11

Lee (2013)

Taiwan, China

Noa

5145

NCAR

< −0.5D

21.6

86.1

NA

Ref 9

Lin (2004)

Taiwan, China

Yes

45,345

CAR

<−0.25D

18

84

16

Ref17

Lee (2013)

Jeju, Korea

Noa

2805

CAR

< −0.5D

19

83.3

6.8

Ref18

Koh (2014)

Singapore

Noa

28,908

NCAR

< −0.5D

19.5

81.6

14.7

Ref10

Wu (2013)

Shandong, China

Yes

6364

NCAR

≤ −0.5D

17

80

14

Ref12

You (2014)

Beijing, China

Yes

16,771

NCAR

≤ −0.5D

18

74.2

1.8

Ref19

Li (2017)

Beijing, China

Yes

37,424

CAR

≤ −0.5D

15.25

66.48

6.69

Ref13

Matamoros (2015)

France

Yes

100,429

NCAR

≤ −0.5D

38.5

39.1

3.4

Ref19

Dayan (2005)

Israel

Yes

919,929

NCAR

≤ −0.5D

17

28.3

NA

Ref14

Mcknight (2014)

Western Australia

Yes

1344

CAR

< −0.5D

20.1

23.7

NA

Ref21

Meta-analysisb

–

–

–

–

–

–

70 (49–90)

12 (8–16)

–

  1. adata from male conscripts; NA not available, Ref reference NCAR non-cycloplegic autorefraction, CAR cycloplegic autorefraction. b pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval of myopia and high myopia by meta-analysis