Programme choice for perimetry in neurological conditions (PoPiN): a systematic review of perimetry options and patterns of visual field loss
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xuejiao Qin|
|6 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anton Lennikov|
|9 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Afsun Sahin|
|20 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Hepworth|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Aug 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Lauren Hepworth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Aug 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2018||Editorially accepted|
|10 Sep 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12886-018-0912-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.