Table 1 Comparison between performance of the pervious methods for detection of exudate, hemorrhage and microaneurysm
From: Fundus images analysis using deep features for detection of exudates, hemorrhages and microaneurysms
Methodology | Exudate | Hemorrhage | Microaneurysm | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sensitivity | specificity | sensitivity | specificity | sensitivity | specificity | |
Tan et al. [24] | 0.87 | 0.98 | 0.62 | 0.98 | 0.46 | 0.97 |
Sinthanayothin et al. [29] | 0.88 | 0.99 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.88 |
Grandet et al. [30] | 0.94 | – | 0.89 | – | – | – |
Naqvi et al. [43] | 0.92 | 0.81 | ||||
Walter et al. [23] | 0.92 | – | – | – | – | – |
Fraz et al. [8] | 0.92 | 0.81 | – | – | – | – |
Sopharak et al. [18] | 0.82 | 0.99 | – | – | – | – |
Prentašić et al. [44] | 0.78 | – | – | – | – | – |
Welfer et at. [17] | 0.7 | 0.98 | – | – | – | – |
Niemeijer et al. [21] | – | – | 0.31 | – | 0.31 | – |
Fleming et al. [20] | – | – | – | – | 0.63 | – |
Walter et al. [14] | – | – | – | – | 0.88 | – |
Garcia et al. [28] | – | – | 0.86 | – | 0.86 | – |
Quellec et al. [19] | – | – | – | – | 0.89 | – |
Bae et al. [16] | – | – | 0.85 | – | – | – |
Walter et al. [14] | – | – | – | – | 0.88 | – |