Comparison of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation and SMILE to select the appropriate surgical method for high myopia

Table 5 Time courses of the optical quality parameters in the SMILE (−6.25 to −10 D) and EVO-ICL (−6.25 to −10 D) groups

MTF	Preoperative			1 week postoperation			3 month postoperation
MTF	SMILE		EVO-ICL	SMILE		EVO-ICL	SMILE		EVO-ICL
Cut-off frequency	48.36 ± 5.67		48.46 ± 5.18	44.81 ± 7.33		44.48 ± 5.51	46.34 ± 4.23		48.96 ± 3.69
P-value		P = 1.000			P = 1.000			P = 0.049*
SR	0.25 ± 0.05		0.26 ± 0.06	0.23 ± 0.03		0.22 ± 0.03	0.26 ± 0.06		0.26 ± 0.06
P-value		P = 0.999			P = 0.590			P = 1.000
OV 100%	1.62 ± 0.14		1.61 ± 0.13	1.45 ± 0.33		1.45 ± 0.29	1.54 ± 0.16		1.59 ± 0.17
P-value		P = 1.000			P = 1.000			P = 0.887
OV 20%	1.26 ± 0.23		1.22 ± 0.21	1.10 ± 0.19		1.03 ± 0.12	1.13 ± 0.26		1.14 ± 0.25
P-value		P = 1.000			P = 0.359			P = 1.000
OV 9%	0.71 ± 0.14		0.72 ± 0.15	0.60 ± 0.09		0.61 ± 0.09	0.67 ± 0.13		0.69 ± 0.16
P-value		P = 1.000			P = 1.000			P = 1.000
OSI	0.40 ± 0.11		0.41 ± 0.11	0.55 ± 0.22		0.54 ± 0.26	0.42 ± 0.13		0.43 ± 0.13
P-value		P = 1.000			P = 1.000			P = 1.000

P=P-value of the difference between visual quality parameters in the SMILE and EVO-ICL implantation groups
MTF modulation transfer function, OSI objective scattering index, OV OQAS value
*P < 0.05 = significant difference

ISSN: 1471-2415