Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies

From: Comparison of face-down posturing with nonsupine posturing after macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis

First author

Publication year

Design

MH stage

Sample size(Patients)

Group size(Eyes)

Average age

Gender ratio (Male/female)

Duration of FDP

Details of the surgical procedure

Intra- and postoperative evaluating parameters

Follow-up periods

FDP/NSP

FDP/NSP

FDP

NSP

Alberti, M

2016

RCT

Stage 2 3 4

68

34/34

(69.8 ± 6.9) / (69.3 ± 5.7)

3/12

9/6

3 days

23-G PPV with the fill of 15%C3F8 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

3 months

Alberti, M

2015

Retrospective study

Stage 2 3 4

117

66/56

(70.4 ± 6.8) / (69.5 ± 5.8)

22/44

21/36

3 days

23-G PPV with the fill of 15%C3F8 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

6 months

Feist, RM

2014

Retrospective study

NA

82

57/25

NA

27/35

11/14

3 days

PPV with the fill of C3F8 or SF6 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

NA

Forsaa, VA

2013

Retrospective study

Stage 2 3 4

64

33/34

(68.4 ± 9.0) / (71.7 ± 6.8)

8/2

4/5

3 days

23-G PPV with the fill of 22–30%SF6 or 16–20%C2F6 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

4.7–19.8 months

Yorston, D

2012

RCT

Stage 2 3 4

30

16/14

(71.1 ± 5.9) / (68.0 ± 5.6)

1/15

0/14

10 days

20-G PPV with the fill of 14%C3F8 and the peel of ILM.The phacoemulsification with introcular lens insertion was carried out.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

6 months

Lange, CA

2012

RCT

Stage 2 3 4

30

15/15

(66.8 ± 5.9) / (71.0 ± 6.2)

7/11

11/6

10 days

20-G PPV with the fill of 14%C3F8 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

6–8 weeks

Tadayoni, R

2011

RCT

≤400 μm

69

34/35

(67.31 ± 6.46) / (66.31 ± 6.51)

11/23

15/20

10 days

PPV with the fill of 17%C2F6.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

3 months

Guillaubey, A

2008

RCT

Stage 2 3 4

144

72/78

(55.7 ± 9.9) / (55.7 ± 7.4)

25/47

27/51

10 days

20-G PPV with the fill of 14%C3F8, 17%C2F6 or 20%SF6 and the peel of ILM.When needed, 62/150 had phacovitrectomy.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

6 months

Tranos, PG

2007

RCT

Stage 2 3 4

41

25/16

NA

NA

NA

10 days

20-G PPV with the fill of 16%C3F8 and the peel of ILM.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, 25-Visual Function Questionnaire(VFQ-25) and complications

4 months

Simcock, PR

2001

Non-randomised historically controlled study

Stage 2 3

33

13/20

NA

2/11

5/15

10 days

PPV with the fill of 20% C2F6.phacoemulsification with introcular lens insertion was combined.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

3 months

Szurman, P

2000

Consecutive case control study

Stage 2 3 4

50

25/25

(67 ± 5.6) / (67 ± 4.2)

6/19

6/19

14 days

PPV with fill of 20%SF6 or 16% C3F8.

Postoperative BCVA, MH closure rate, complications

6–12 months

  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial. MH Macular hole. FDP Face-down posturing. NSP Non-supine posturing. BCVA Best corrected vision acuity. NA Not available