Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included RCT studies (n = 8)

From: Comparison of postoperative visual performance between bifocal and trifocal intraocular Lens based on randomized controlled trails: a meta-analysis

Study

Year

Site

Designs

Bifocal

Trifocal

Follow up (mouth)

Age (Mean ± SD, year)

N

IOL types

Age (Mean ± SD, year)

N

IOL types

Gundersen KG

2016

Norway

RCT

70.2 ± 7.8

11

ReSTOR SND1T(Toric)

62.1 ± 7.5

11

FineVision Toric

3

Jonker SM

2015

The Netherlands

RCT

64.0 ± 8.8

13

ReSTOR+  3.0D (SN6AD1)

62.6 ± 8.8

15

Finevision Micro F

6

Alio JL

2017

New Zealand

RCT

63.2 ± 7.7

17/15

AT LISA 809 M/ReSTOR (SN6AD1)

63.2 ± 7.7

17

AT LISA tri 839MP

6

Bilbao-Calabuig R

2016

Spain

RCT

56.3 ± 6.9

11

ReSTOR (SN6AD2/SN6AD1)

56.3 ± 6.9

12

FineVision

3

Cochener B

2016

France

RCT

60.6 ± 9.1

12

Tecnis ZMB00

58.7 ± 6.4

15

FineVision Micro F

6

Mojzis P

2014

Czech

RCT

62.3 ± 5.7

15

AT LISA 801

55.2 ± 7.0

15

AT LISA tri 839MP

3

Mojzis P

2017

Czech

RCT

NR

18

AT LISA 801

NR

20

AT LISA tri 839MP

12

Gundersen KG

2016

Norway

RCT

53 ± 8

30

ReSTOR (SN6AD1/ SN6AD2)

65 ± 9

25

AT LISA tri839MP

24

  1. N The number of people received the cataract surgery
  2. NR Not report