Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of keratometric measurements between color light-emitting diode topography and Scheimpflug camera

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabor Nemeth
26 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mayank Nanavaty
2 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Xian-Hua Cui
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gabor Nemeth
5 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
1 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Xian-Hua Cui
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
1 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Xian-Hua Cui
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12886-019-1106-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement