Associations of subjective and objective clinical outcomes of visual functions with quality of life in Chinese glaucoma patients: a cross-sectional study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Oct 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tomoko Naito|
|6 Mar 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|21 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Li Yang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|21 Jul 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Li Yang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jul 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12886-019-1176-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.