Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Lessons learned from the development and implementation of a patient-reported outcome and experience measure (POEM) in an Australian glaucoma practice

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Nov 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmad A. Aref
18 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
11 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Parul Ichhpujani
12 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Crabb
30 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Alison Fraenkel
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
22 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Crabb
29 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Alison Fraenkel
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Alison Fraenkel
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12886-019-1198-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement