Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 3 Summary of Contrast Sensitivity and Halos

Study^a, year	EDOF IOLs	Control IOLs	CS: Under photopic conditions	CS: Under scotopic conditions	Halos
Pedrotti, 2016 [20]	Tecnis Symfony	Tecnis ZCB00	NSD	NSD	NSD
AMO, 2017 [24]	Tecnis Symfony	Tecnis ZCB00	Better in monofocal IOLs group	Better in monofocal IOLs group	More halos in EDOF IOLs group
Pilger, 2018 [21]	Tecnis Symfony	Tecnis ZCB00	NR	Better in monofocal IOLs group	NSD
Cochener, 2018 [9]	Tecnis Symfony	PanOptix/ FineVison	NR	NR	NSD
Escandón-García, 2018 [18]	Tecnis Symfony	PanOptix/ FineVison	NSD	For 1.5 cpd, better in EDOF IOLs group	NR
Mencucci, 2018 [10]	Tecnis Symfony	PanOptix/AT LISA tri 839MP	Better in EDOF IOLs group	Better in EDOF IOLs group	NSD
Monaco, 2017 [19]	Tecnis Symfony	PanOptix/SN60WF	NR	NR	EDOF verses trifocus: NSD; Both were worse than monofocal IOL
Ruiz-Mesa, 2017 [22]	Tecnis Symfony	FineVison	NSD	NSD	NSD
Ruiz-Mesa, 2018 [23]	Tecnis Symfony	PanOptix	NSD	NSD	NSD

AMO Abbott Medical Optics, EDOF extended depth of focus, CS contrast sensitivity, IOLs intraocular lenses, cpd cycles per degree, NSD no significant difference, NR not report
^aFirst author or sponsor

ISSN: 1471-2415