Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group

Table 1 Baseline demographics and mean IOP of the study population

	N	Age	NCT (mm Hg)		iCare Pro (mm Hg)		GAT (mm Hg)		CCT (μm)	AL (mm)
	N	Age	Mean ± SD	range	Mean ± SD	range	Mean ± SD	range	CCT (μm)	AL (mm)
Total	200	56.9 ± 18.3	21.4 ± 12.0	4.0–62.4	21.0 ± 11.5	6.1–62.0	20.7 ± 11.6	4.0–63.3	537.8 ± 36.7	24.1 ± 2.1
Male	76	51.8 ± 19.2	24.9 ± 13.9	4.0–62.4	24.7 ± 14.0	6.5–62.0	24.2 ± 14.2	4.0–63.3	541.2 ± 35.6	24.8 ± 2.5
Female	124	60.1 ± 17.0	19.3 ± 10.2	6.5–56.1	18.7 ± 9.0	6.1–50.8	18.5 ± 9.1	6.0–50.6	535.8 ± 37.4	23.6 ± 1.6

NCT Non-contact tonometer, iCare rebound tonometer iCare Pro, GAT Goldmann tonometry, IOP Intraocular pressure, SD Standard deviation, CCT Central corneal thickness, AL Axial length

ISSN: 1471-2415