Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study

Ramtohul, Prithvi; Parrat, Eric; Denis, Danièle; Lorenzi, Umberto

doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1294-8

Table 1 Patient characteristics. Group 1: ILM Removal Group and Group 2: Inverted ILM flap Group

From: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study

Patient no.	Age range	Eye	Preoperative lens status	MH diameter (μm)	Operative procedure	Tamponade	Preoperative BCVA (decimal)
Group 1
1	70–74	R	IOL	598	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.2
2	75–79	R	IOL	652	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.01
3	75–79	L	IOL	479	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.2
4	60–64	R	Phake	753	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.1
5	75–79	R	IOL	451	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.1
6	65–69	L	IOL	505	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.2
7	55–59	L	IOL	697	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.05
8	60–64	R	IOL	500	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.2
9	65–69	L	Phake	1028	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.05
10	70–74	R	Phake	479	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.15
11	65–69	L	Phake	401	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.2
12	70–74	R	IOL	603	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.1
13	60–64	R	IOL	401	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.05
14	70–74	L	IOL	654	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.2
15	75–79	L	IOL	400	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.1
16	50–54	R	Phake	879	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.05
17	60–64	R	IOL	695	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.05
18	65–69	R	IOL	450	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.05
19	60–64	L	IOL	508	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.1
20	70–74	R	IOL	400	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.15
21	65–69	R	Phake	400	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.1
22	65–69	R	IOL	650	PPV, PL	C2F6	0.05
23	60–64	R	Phake	621	PPV, PL, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.1
Group 2
1	65–69	L	IOL	426	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.12
2	70–74	L	IOL	432	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.3
3	65–69	R	Phake	502	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.16
4	65–69	R	IOL	571	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1
5	65–69	R	IOL	575	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.08
6	70–74	L	IOL	573	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1
7	75–79	R	Phake	593	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.16
8	65–69	L	IOL	640	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.04
9	70–74	R	IOL	642	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.16
10	60–64	R	IOL	694	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.08
11	65–69	L	IOL	699	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.08
12	60–64	L	Phake	691	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.04
13	65–69	R	Phake	739	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.08
14	45–49	L	IOL	746	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.16
15	75–79	L	Phake	798	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.1
16	60–64	R	IOL	792	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.16
17	75–79	L	IOL	833	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.16
18	70–74	R	IOL	891	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1
19	40–44	L	IOL	1159	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1
20	55–59	R	Phake	674	PPV, ILM, PEA, IOL	C2F6	0.05
21	75–79	R	IOL	721	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1
22	55–59	R	IOL	438	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.25
23	65–69	R	IOL	524	PPV, ILM	C2F6	0.1

Abbreviations: BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, C2F8 hexafluoroethane, ILM Inverted ILM flap, IOL intraocular lens, LogMAR logarithm of minimum angle of resolution, MH macular hole, PEA phacoemulsification, PPV pars plana vitrectomy

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com

BMC Ophthalmology

Contact us