Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by group B streptococcus; case reports and review of 35 reported cases

BMC Ophthalmology volume 20, Article number: 126 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Group B streptococcus (GBS), a gram-positive coccus that occasionally causes neonatal sepsis or invasive infection in the elderly, has been considered a rare cause of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis (EBE). However, the number of invasive GBS infections is increasing, particularly in elderly patients with underlying conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease and cancer. We report 6 cases of EBE caused by GBS and review the literature.

Methods

Retrospective case series and literature review.

Results

In the current case series, 6 eyes of 6 patients developed EBE caused by GBS. The average age was 73.5 years. The focus of infection included the urinary tract, cellulitis, arthritis, peritonitis, catheter-associated infection and endocarditis. Four patients had DM. While all 6 strains were sensitive to β-lactams (penicillins and cephems), 4 strains were resistant to levofloxacin (no data for 1 isolate). Each case was treated with the systemic antibiotic to which the individual strain was sensitive. All cases showed poor visual acuity at presentation (decimal visual acuity: less than 0.03). Vitrectomy with intravitreal antibiotics injection was performed in 4 cases. Visual acuity recovered in 4 cases and did not recover in 2 cases, even after vitrectomy. The literature review of 53 eyes of 41 patients revealed that 60% of eyes finally lost all vision, and death occurred in 2 cases. Initial visual acuity of less than counting fingers was associated with a final outcome of lost vision. Of 41 patients, 13 (32%) had DM as an underlying medical condition. The most common extra-ocular infection focus was endocarditis (37%).

Conclusions

DM is common in patients with EBE caused by GBS. While the 4 cases in the current report had a relatively good visual acuity outcome, despite poor initial visual acuity, the literature review indicated that EBE caused by GBS is generally a severe condition with a poor prognosis. The current study also indicates the importance of considering the possibility of endocarditis on encountering EBE caused by GBS.

Peer Review reports

Background

Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis (EBE), a complication of systemic blood-stream infection, is a rare but dangerous threat to vision. Studies from different geographical regions have obtained different results on causative organisms in EBE: East Asian reports found that gram-negative organisms, especially Klebsiella pneumoniae, were the leading cause of EBE, while Western reports found that gram-positive organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumonia were more frequent [1,2,3,4]. Group B streptococcus (GBS; Streptococcus agalactiae), a gram-positive coccus that occasionally causes neonatal sepsis or invasive infection in the elderly, has been considered a rare cause of EBE, especially in East Asia. However, the number of invasive GBS infections is increasing, particularly in elderly patients with underlying conditions such as diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease and cancer [5,6,7,8]. In the last 15 years, our affiliated institutions (Tohoku University Hospital and Gifu University Hospital), located in Japan, have seen at least 6 cases of EBE caused by GBS in elderly patients. Moreover, an online search revealed 10 more cases in Japan [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Thus, at least 35 cases of EBE caused by GBS in adults have been reported in English or Japanese [2, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Although a variety of microorganisms cause EBE, we consider that GBS is one of the most important. Here, we examine the clinical characteristics of EBE caused by GBS, describe 6 cases we observed, and review relevant recent literature, including a comparison of East Asian and Western cases.

Methods

Patients

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 6 eyes of 6 patients with EBE caused by GBS, all of whom were observed at Tohoku University Hospital or Gifu University Hospital between December 2003 and September 2016. The diagnosis of EBE caused by GBS was based on positive results from culture testing of blood or ocular samples (either the aqueous humor or vitreous body) obtained from patients with iritis and vitritis during ophthalmic examination. Patients with a potential exogenous cause of infection, such as trauma, recent ocular surgery or corneal ulcer, were excluded. Clinical histories, including underlying medical conditions, initial symptoms, culture testing, infection foci, treatment and final visual acuity outcome were examined. Database searches were performed with Medline for articles in English and Google Scholar for articles in Japanese for the period ending in June 2019. Each search query included the terms “Group B streptococcus”, “Streptococcus agalactiae” and “endogenous endophthalmitis”. In Google Scholar, these Japanese equivalents for these terms were used. These searches identified 47 eyes of 35 patients with EBE caused by GBS (Medline: 36 eyes of 29 patients in 18 English articles, Google Scholar: 11 eyes of 6 patients in 6 Japanese articles). Thus, combined with the 6 eyes of 6 patients observed directly, this study retrospectively reviewed the records of 53 eyes of 41 patients.

Microbiological studies

At Tohoku University Hospital, isolated colonies on 5% sheep blood agar plates were evaluated with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) using the VITEK MS ver. 3.0 (bioMérieux, Marcy L’Étoile, France); this revealed that the colonies comprised Streptococcus agalactiae. At Gifu University Hospital, identification of GBS was performed with Gram staining, a catalase reaction, examination of colony morphology, hemolysis with a blood agar plate, and an examination for the Lancefield group B antigen. Susceptibility testing for antibiotics was performed with the microdilution method at both participating institutions. The MicroScan WalkAway 96 plus System (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) with a MICrofast7J panel was used at Tohoku University Hospital and the RAISUS system (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an NKMP1 plate was used at Gifu University Hospital. All results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standard method.

Statistical analysis

Fisher’s exact test was used to compare binary data. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Observational case series

A clinical summary of the 6 cases observed at our clinics is shown in Table 1. The average age was 73.5 years. Every patient had unilateral endophthalmitis (3 left eyes and 3 right eyes). Four patients had DM. Three patients reported visual disturbance as the initial symptom, while the other three initially reported systemic symptoms, such as fatigue, anorexia and algor. The specialties of the initially consulted doctors were as follows: ophthalmologist (3 cases), physician (2 cases), and surgeon (1 case). The diagnosis of EBE caused by GBS was based on positive findings from blood culture testing in 5 of 6 cases. Culture testing of ocular samples was also performed in 3 of these 5 cases, with positive findings in 2 cases. One of 6 cases (case 4) had negative findings in blood culture testing, but had positive findings in ocular sample culture testing, leading us to diagnose EBE caused by GBS. The focus of the infection in the cases was as follows: urinary tract infection (UTI) (3 cases); cellulitis (2 cases); arthritis (1 case); peritonitis (1 case); catheter-associated infection (1 case); and endocarditis (1 case). UTI and cellulitis co-occurred in 2 cases, and arthritis additionally co-occurred in one of these 2 cases. Susceptibility testing used blood samples in all cases except for case 4, for which ocular samples were used (both aqueous and vitreous samples in this case returned the same result). Susceptibility testing revealed that all the strains of GBS in these patients were sensitive to β-lactam antibiotics (penicillins, cephems and carbapenems) and vancomycin. Each strain had varying susceptibility to other antibiotics, such as macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin), tetracyclines (minocycline), fluoroquinolone (levofloxacin) and aminoglycoside (arbekacin), although some data were unavailable, as shown in Table 2. Among them, 4 strains were resistant to levofloxacin (no data for 1 isolate). Vitrectomy was performed in 4 cases, including the intravitreal injection of antibiotics. In case 2, vitrectomy could not be performed due to a poor systemic condition. In case 3, the patient’s condition improved with only systemic antibacterial therapy. Visual acuity recovered in 4 cases. In the other cases (cases 4 and 6), visual acuity did not recover even after vitrectomy.

Table 1 Clinical details of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis caused by group B streptococcus (present case series)
Full size table
Table 2 Susceptibility test of antibiotics (Present case series)
Full size table

Literature review

We reviewed 41 cases of EBE caused by GBS, including the 6 cases observed at our clinics. Twenty-two cases were from East Asia (16 cases from Japan, 5 cases from Singapore and 1 case from South Korea). The other 19 cases were from Western countries (11 cases from the United States, 5 cases from the United Kingdom, 2 cases from Canada and 1 case from Spain). The 41 cases included 21 men, 18 women and 2 cases with unstated sex. The average age was 65.5 years (SD: 12.7; range: 42–95 years). In 29 patients (71%), EBE was unilateral: 16 cases (55%) in the right eye, 11 (38%) cases in the left eye, and unstated in 2 (7%) cases. Twelve patients (29%) had bilateral EBE. Visual acuity (initial and final) in the 43 eyes of 34 patients for whom these data were available is shown in Fig. 1. Of these 43 eyes, 24 eyes of 19 patients were from East Asia and 19 eyes of 14 patients were from Western countries. Twenty-six eyes (60%) finally lost all vision or died (i.e., no light perception [NLP], phthisis bulbi, evisceration, enucleation or death). Seven eyes (16%) achieved final visual acuities greater than 0.6 in decimal values. There was no significant difference in the visual acuity outcome between the cases from East Asia and Western countries. The group of subjects with a final outcome of loss of vision or death (including NLP, phthisis bulbi, evisceration, enucleation and death) had a significantly greater incidence of initial visual acuity of less than counting fingers (CF) (Table 3). Among the 15 cases that underwent vitrectomy, 10 cases had an initial visual acuity of less than CF. However, 7 of these 10 cases lost vision even after vitrectomy. This rate of vision loss was not significantly different than in the cases with initial visual acuity of less than CF that did not undergo vitrectomy (17/22 cases; 77%). Moreover, a patient age ≥ 80 years at presentation was not associated with a final loss of vision (Table 3). Of 41 patients, 13 (32%) had DM as an underlying medical condition. The second most common condition was human immunodeficiency virus infection (3 cases, 7%). Extraocular infection foci are shown in Table 4. The most common focuses were as follows: endocarditis (15, 37%); arthritis (13, 32%); cellulitis (8, 20%); UTI (6, 15%); pneumonia (4, 10%); and meningitis (3, 7%). These showed no significant differences in the cases from East Asia and Western countries. Of 41 patients, 17 (41%) had infection foci in more than 3 organs (multiple infections in a single type of organ, such as joints or soft tissue, were counted as single foci).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Visual outcome in 43 eyes of 34 patients (from literature review). Visual acuity is shown with a decimal value. Black dots represent data from East Asia and black circles represent data from Western countries. The larger black dots represent data from the cases directly observed by the authors. CF = counting fingers; HM = hand motion; LP = light perception; NLP = no light perception; encu/evis = enucleation/evisceration

Full size image
Table 3 Visual outcome and clinical background of 43 eyes (Literature review)
Full size table
Table 4 Infection focuses of 41 cases (Literature review)
Full size table

Discussion

Our review showed that EBE caused by GBS has an extremely poor prognosis, including vision loss and even death (in 2 cases). Previous reports on invasive GBS infection in nonpregnant adults have also shown a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate as high as 8–24% [6, 34, 35]. Nevertheless, visual acuity recovered in 4 of our 6 directly-observed cases, despite relatively poor initial visual acuity, reaching decimal visual acuity of more than 0.8 in 3 cases. Although a review of 41 cases showed that poor initial visual acuity (less than CF) was significantly associated with a final complete loss of vision, no other clinical characteristics, such as surgical intervention with vitrectomy surgery or age, were predictive of outcome. We also investigated various clinical background factors, such as underlying medical conditions, initial symptoms, the type of referring doctor, the number of days between the onset of ocular symptoms and the initial examination by ophthalmologists, the use of intravitreally injected antibiotics, age, and surgical intervention, but none of these factors were associated with the favourable outcomes we observed. Some reports found differing mortality rates with the differing serotype of the strain of GBS [34, 35]. We did not investigate the serotype of the GBS strains in the current case series, but the differing virulence of each GBS strain might have affected the prognosis, which could explain our finding that some cases had good outcomes despite poor initial visual acuity.

Susceptibility testing of the isolated GBS strains in the 6 directly-observed cases showed that all 6 strains were sensitive to β-lactams (penicillins and cephems) and vancomycin (no data for 1 isolate) and 4 strains were resistant to levofloxacin (no data for 1 isolate). GBS isolates highly resistant to quinolones were first reported in Japan in 2003, followed by reports from other countries [6, 36,37,38,39]. While quinolone-resistant GBS is common in Japan (40.2%) and Korea (32.7%), it is rare (0.9 to 4.8%) in other countries [35, 40]. Overuse of quinolone in Japan might have increased the incidence of quinolone-resistant GBS [41]. Thus, intravitreal injection with a combination of vancomycin and ceftazidime, which is commonly used as an empirical treatment before a definite diagnosis, may be a good choice for treating EBE caused by GBS, even before the causative microorganism is identified. As for systemic treatment, although penicillins are usually good choices, the largest case study of adult invasive GBS infection in Japan reported that 9 of 443 (2%) isolate GBS strains had reduced penicillin susceptibility [35], and there has been a report of invasive vancomycin-resistant GBS [42]. Awareness of resistant strains is thus important.

In the current review, the most common non-ocular infection focus was endocarditis (37%) while previous research on invasive GBS infection showed that endocarditis was not a common infection focus [43]. This discrepancy may be due to overestimation caused by selection bias, because endocarditis is severe, and thus more likely to be reported. Nevertheless, the high rate described in the current study is noteworthy, because the mortality rate of endocarditis caused by GBS has been reported to be as high as 40% [44]. The diagnosis of endocarditis requires echocardiography, but the current case series showed significant variation in initial symptoms and the medical field of the first doctor consulted. Thus, it is important for all types of doctors, even ophthalmologists, to consider the possibility of endocarditis on encountering EBE, especially caused by GBS, and to obtain adequate consultation from specialists.

Conclusions

The past literature has generally reported that EBE caused by GBS is a severe condition with a poor prognosis, especially when initial visual acuity is low, and that loss of vision is common, even after vitrectomy. Nevertheless, 4 of the 6 patients at our clinic had relatively good outcomes, despite low initial visual acuity. Although we cannot confidently speculate why this was so, our results show that good outcomes may still be possible in severe cases, and that every effort should be made to ensure prompt and accurate diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, our current case series and literature review demonstrates that DM is common in patients with EBE caused by GBS. Finally, the current review highlights that it is important for clinicians to consider the possibility of endocarditis when they encounter EBE, especially when caused by GBS.

Availability of data and materials

All data are presented in the manuscript, figure, and tables.

Abbreviations

GBS:

Group B streptococcus

EBE:

Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

NLP:

No light perception

CF:

Counting fingers

References

  1. Wong JS, Chan TK, Lee HM, Chee SP. Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: an east Asian experience and a reappraisal of a severe ocular affliction. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1483–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Okada AA, Johnson RP, Liles WC, D’Amico DJ, Baker AS. Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis. Report of a ten-year retrospective study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:832–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson TL, Eykyn SJ, Graham EM, Stanford MR. Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series and review of 267 reported cases. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48:403–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Todokoro D, Mochizuki K, Nishida T, Eguchi H, Miyamoto T, Hattori T, et al. Isolates and antibiotic susceptibilities of endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a retrospective multicenter study in Japan. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24:458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lamagni TL, Keshishian C, Efstratiou A, Guy R, Henderson KL, Broughton K, et al. Emerging trends in the epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in England and Wales, 1991-2010. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57:682–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Skoff TH, Farley MM, Petit S, Craig AS, Schaffner W, Gershman K, et al. Increasing burden of invasive group B streptococcal disease in nonpregnant adults, 1990-2007. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:85–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballard MS, Schønheyder HC, Knudsen JD, Lyytikäinen O, Dryden M, Kennedy KJ, et al. The changing epidemiology of group B streptococcus bloodstream infection: a multi-national population-based assessment. Infect Dis (London, England). 2016;48:386–91.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Björnsdóttir ES, Martins ER, Erlendsdóttir H, Haraldsson G, Melo-Cristino J, Kristinsson KG, et al. Changing epidemiology of group B streptococcal infections among adults in Iceland: 1975–2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:379.e9–379.e16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuo K, Nakatuka K, Yano Y, Fujishima W, Kashima K. Group B streptococcal metastatic endophthalmitis in an elderly man without predisposing illness. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 1998;42:304–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakai T, Kohzaki K, Watanabe A, Tsuneoka H, Shimadzu M. Use of DNA microarray analysis in diagnosis of bacterial and fungal endophthalmitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugita K, Tanabe T, Arima N, Saito I. Endogenous endophthalmitis in a case with group B Streptococcus endocarditis. Rinsho Ganka. 2011;65:1955–61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nakatsuka A, Azegami C, Kobayashi H, Kurita H, Kurashina K. A case of endophthalmitis caused by an oral bacterium. J Japanese Stomatol Soc. 2003;52:23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takamoto Y, Kunitomo R, Sassa T, Sakaguchi H, Hagiwara S, Moriyama S, et al. A case of infective endocarditis in which surgical removal of both eyes was inevitable because of bacterial Endopthalmitis. Japanese J Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;36:348–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi K, Fujiseki Y, Takahashi K, Matsumura M. Bacterial Endopathalmitis caused by B Streptococcus endocarditis. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;110:199–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamura H, Kinjyo S, Kaneshima H, Fujita J. A case of group B streptococcus endogenous endophthalmitis in elderly man with diabetes mellitus. J Japanese Assoc Infect Dis. 2006;80:267–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murase Y, Yoshimoto S, Ueda K, Noto M. A case of diabetic patient with group B streptococcal metastatic endophthalmitis. J Japan Diabetes Soc. 1999;42:215–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aoyama Y, Oba Y, Hoshide S, Arai Y, Komori T, Kabutoya T, et al. The early diagnosis of Endophthalmitis due to group B Streptococcus infective endocarditis and its clinical course: a case report and literature review. Intern Med. 2019;58:1295–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakai T, Kimura M, Yoshiyama K, Matono T. Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae: an ophthalmologic emergency. IDCases. 2019;15:e00499.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Farber BP, Weinbaum DL, Dummer JS. Metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145:62–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Brart DP, Eykyn SJ. Septicaemic infection with group B streptococci presenting with endophthalmitis in adults. Eye (Lond). 1992;6(Pt 4):396–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Galloway A, Deighton CM, Deady J, Marticorena IF, Efstratiou A. Type V group B streptococcal septicaemia with bilateral endophthalmitis and septic arthritis. Lancet (London, England). 1993;341:960–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ing EB, Erasmus MJ, Chisholm LD. Metastatic group B streptococcal endophthalmitis from a cutaneous foot ulcer. Can J Ophthalmol. 1993;28:238–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagelberg HP, Petashnick DE, To KW, Woodcome HA. Group B streptococcal metastatic endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:498–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Buglass TD, Romanchuk KG. Fatal case of group B streptococcal endogenous endophthalmitis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1995;30:149–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddiqui MA, Lester RM. Septic arthritis and bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44:476–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosón B, Carratalà J, Peña C, Gudiol F. Endogenous endophthalmitis due to Streptococcus agalactiae: case report and revie. Clin Microbiol Infect. 1996;2:147–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee S-Y, Chee S-P. Group B Streptococcus endogenous endophthalmitis : case reports and review of the literature. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1879–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pokharel D, Doan AP, Lee AG. Group B streptococcus endogenous endophthalmitis presenting as septic arthritis and a homonymous hemianopsia due to embolic stroke. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:300–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chihara S, Siccion E. Group B streptococcus endocarditis with endophthalmitis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta SR, Agnani S, Tehrani S, Yeh S, Lauer AK, Suhler EB. Endogenous Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus) endophthalmitis as a presenting sign of precursor T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:384–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saffra N, Rakhamimov A, Husney R, Ghitan M. Streptococcus agalactiae endogenous endophthalmitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:pii:bcr2013008981.

  32. Wu Z, Huang J, Huynh S, Sadda S. Bilateral endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to group B streptococcal sepsis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127:1999.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sim YR, Lee YJ, Park SW, Kim SH, Choi JH, Choi JY, et al. Infective endocarditis presenting as endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to Streptococcus agalactiae in a healthy adult: case report and literature review. Infect Chemother. 2017;49:286–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Phares CR, Lynfield R, Farley MM, Mohle-Boetani J, Harrison LH, Petit S, et al. Epidemiology of invasive group B streptococcal disease in the United States, 1999-2005. JAMA. 2008;299:2056–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Morozumi M, Wajima T, Takata M, Iwata S, Ubukata K. Molecular characteristics of group B streptococci isolated from adults with invasive infections in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2695–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawamura Y, Fujiwara H, Mishima N, Tanaka Y, Tanimoto A, Ikawa S, et al. First Streptococcus agalactiae isolates highly resistant to quinolones, with point mutations in gyrA and parC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47:3605–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Faccone D, Guerriero L, Méndez E, Errecalde L, Cano H, Yoyas N, et al. Fluoroquinolone-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae isolates from Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2010;42:203–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Piccinelli G, Gargiulo F, Corbellini S, Ravizzola G, Bonfanti C, Caruso A, et al. Emergence of the first levofloxacin-resistant strains of streptococcus agalactiae isolated in Italy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:2466–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Y-H, Chen C-L, Hou J-N, Wang Y-R, Lin T-Y, Wang M-H, et al. Serotype distribution and resistance genes associated with macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus agalactiae isolates from a hospital in southern Taiwan. Biom J. 2015;38:215–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ryu H, Park YJ, Kim YK, Chang J, yun YJK. Dominance of clonal complex 10 among the levofloxacin-resistant Streptococcus agalactiae isolated from bacteremic patients in a Korean hospital. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20:509–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Muraki Y, Kitamura M, Maeda Y, Kitahara T, Mori T, Ikeue H, et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial consumption and resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates at 203 Japanese hospitals in 2010. Infection. 2013;41:415–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Park C, Nichols M, Schrag SJ. Two cases of invasive vancomycin-resistant group B streptococcus infection. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:885–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. High KP, Edwards MS, Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal infections in elderly adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:839–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sambola A, Miro JM, Tornos MP, Almirante B, Moreno-Torrico A, Gurgui M, et al. Streptococcus agalactiae infective endocarditis: analysis of 30 cases and review of the literature, 1962-1998. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1576–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Hiroshige Mikamo and Mr. Makoto Katsumi for laboratory assistance and Mr. Tim Hilts for reviewing this manuscript.

Funding

There was no funding or grant support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1, Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan

    Masaaki Yoshida, Shunji Yokokura, Kazuichi Maruyama, Takaaki Otomo, Hiroshi Kunikata & Toru Nakazawa

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan

    Takashi Nishida & Kiyofumi Mochizuki

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan

    Takashi Suzuki

  4. Department of Advanced Ophthalmic Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

    Koji M. Nishiguchi & Toru Nakazawa

  5. Department of Retinal Disease Control, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

    Hiroshi Kunikata & Toru Nakazawa

  6. Department of Ophthalmic Imaging and Information Analytics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan

    Toru Nakazawa

Authors
  1. Masaaki Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shunji Yokokura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Takashi Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kiyofumi Mochizuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Takashi Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazuichi Maruyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takaaki Otomo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Koji M. Nishiguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hiroshi Kunikata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Toru Nakazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MY was a major contributor to the drafting of the manuscript. SY and [TN]2 reviewed and edited the manuscript. [TN]1, [KM]1, and TS acquired the clinical data. [KM]2, TO, KN, and HK were responsible for the interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shunji Yokokura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of Tohoku University Hospital (2017–1-553) and Gifu University Hospital (29–347) and was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The need for consent to participate was waived by the appropriate IRB as the study was retrospective. Instead of obtaining written informed consent, information on the purpose and implementation of the research was released on the website of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine and Gifu University School of Medicine. The IRBs of the facilities approved this procedure.

Consent for publication

In lieu of obtaining consent for publication from the subjects, identifying data, such as age and sex, were anonymized.

Competing interests

Author Kazuichi Maruyama is an Editorial Board Member for the BMC Series.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshida, M., Yokokura, S., Nishida, T. et al. Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by group B streptococcus; case reports and review of 35 reported cases. BMC Ophthalmol 20, 126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01378-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01378-0

Keywords

BMC Ophthalmology

ISSN: 1471-2415

Contact us