From: The relationship of central corneal thickness with the status of diabetic retinopathy
References (Author, year) | Eyes (N) | CCT Mean Ā± SD | Method of CCT measurement | Significant correlation | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM group | Control group | DM group | Control group | |||
Lee at al. 2006 [2] | 200 | 100 | 588.2Ā±72.7 Ī¼m | 567.8Ā±73.8 Ī¼m | Ultrasound pachymetry | Yes |
Wiemer et al. 2007 [3] | 102 (DM type 1) | 69 | 0.586 Ā±0.003 mm | 0.578Ā± 0.004 mm | Topcon SL-45 Scheimpflug camera | No |
101( DM type 2) | 0.578 Ā±0.003 mm | |||||
Busted et al. 1981 [5] | Diabetics without PR | 67 | 0.544Ā±0.028 mm | 0.527Ā±0.028 mm | Modified Haag-Streit pachometer | Yes |
Diabetics with PR | 0.566Ā±0.027 mm | |||||
(total 81) | Ā | |||||
Keoleian et al. 1992 [25] | 14 | 14 | 0.56 Ā± 0.02 mm | 0.56 Ā± 0.04 mm | Pachymetry | No |
Ćzdamar et al. 2010 [14] | 100 | 145 | 564Ā±30 Ī¼m | 538Ā±35 Ī¼m | Biopachymeter (Tomey, Nagoya) | Yes |
Inoue et al. 2002 [26] | 99 | 97 | 538Ā± 36 Ī¼m | 537 Ā± 38 Ī¼m | Ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000; Tomey, Nagoya) | No |