Skip to main content

Table 8 Comparison of demographic data for patients with recurrence of subretinal fluid, after photodynamic therapy, between the two treatment groups

From: One-year results of half-dose versus one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic or recurrent central serous chorioretinopathy

Demographic (N=15)

Half-dose PDT group (n = 7eyes/ 5patients)

One-third-dose PDT group (n = 8eyes/7 patients)

P-Value

Age mean±sd (years)

52.00±6.44

48.14±9.99

0.469

Sex,No.(%)

 Male

5 (100)

7 (100)

 Female

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Study eye, No. (%)

 RE

4 (57.1)

3 (37.5)

0.619

 LE

3 (42.9)

5 (62.5)

BMI,mean±sd,kg/m2

23.81±6.85

24.99±3.30

0.697

duration of symptom, mean±sd, (months)

15.00±11.59

16.25±8.69

0.815

Group Type

 recurrent

0 (0.0)

3 (37.5)

0.200

 chronic recurrent

7 (100)

5 (62.5)

Leakage type, No. (%)

 Smoke stack

0 (0.0)

1 (12.5)

0.348

 Ink blot

2 (28.6)

4 (50.0)

 Diffuse

5 (71.4)

3 (37.5)

GLP (mean±sd)

2187.14±1901.31

2339.00±1457.98

0.864

PDT spot size, (mean±sd)

3514.29±2132.62

3638.38±2080.62

0.911

Initial BCVA

 LogMAR, (mean±sd)

0.62±0.38

0.30±0.33

0.099

Initial CRT, (mean±sd)

321.00±135.67

288.25±60.02

0.546

  1. Abbreviations: BCVA best corrected visual acuity; BMI body mass index, CRT central retinal thickness, GLD greatest linear diameter; LogMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, PDT photodynamic therapy, SD standard deviation