Skip to main content

Table 4 Difference in counting data of parameters of Topolyzer between true negative group and false positive group

From: The possible causes for tomography suspect Keratoconus in a Chinese cohort

 

TNG

FPG

 

N

(%)

N

(%)

P*

ISV

normal

158

(98.8)

173

(94.5)

0.097

suspect

1

(0.6)

7

(3.8)

 

KC

1

(0.6)

3

(1.6)

 

IVA

normal

159

(99.4)

156

(85.2)

< 0.001

suspect

1

(0.6)

15

(8.2)

 

KC

0

(0.0)

12

(6.6)

 

KI

normal

156

(97.5)

135

(73.8)

< 0.001

suspect

2

(1.3)

17

(9.3)

 

KC

2

(1.3)

31

(16.9)

 

CKI

normal

160

(100.0)

183

(100.0)

KC

0

(0.0)

0

(0.0)

 

RMin

normal

160

(100.0)

183

(100.0)

KC

0

(0.0)

0

(0.0)

 

IHA

normal

155

(96.9)

160

(87.4)

0.003

suspect

3

(1.9)

5

(2.7)

 

KC

2

(1.3)

18

(9.8)

 

IHD

normal

159

(99.4)

176

(96.2)

0.076

suspect

0

(0.0)

5

(2.7)

 

KC

1

(0.6)

2

(1.1)

 

ABR

normal

123

(76.9)

136

(74.3)

0.583

KC

37

(23.1)

47

(25.7)

 

Class

KC

2

(1.3)

33

(18.0)

< 0.001

Normal

158

(98.8)

150

(82.0)

 
  1. TNG True Negative Group, FPG False Positive Group, KC keratoconus, ISV index of surface variance, IVA index of vertical asymmetry, KI keratoconus index, CKI center keratoconus index, RMin minimum sagittal curvature, IHA index of height asymmetry, IHD index of height decentration, ABR, zernike aberration coefficient
  2. *Pearson Chi square test was used, fisher exact test was used if number of one grid less than 1