Optimization of orbital retraction during endoscopic transorbital approach via quantitative measurement of the intraocular pressure – [SevEN 006]

Table 1 Patient data in clinical cases

No.	Sex	Age	Pathology	Location	Tumor size (mm)	Surgical position, head position	Preop. IOP		Postop. IOP
No.	Sex	Age	Pathology	Location	Tumor size (mm)	Surgical position, head position	Lt	Rt	Lt	Rt
1	F	39	Schwannoma	V2, PPF, Lt.	12.5 × 23.4 × 24.4	Supine, neutral	14	16	14	19
2	F	42	Schwannoma	Trigeminal, Lt.	21 × 18.8 × 23.2	Supine, neutral	16	15	14	16
3	F	42	Meningioma	CS wall, Lt.	31.1 × 32.6 × 35.2	Supine, neutral	15	12	11	12
4	F	42	Meningioma	Temporal tip, Lt.	17.5 × 20.3 × 19.5	Supine, neutral	11	14	12	13
5	F	47	Schwannoma	Trigeminal, Rt.	30 × 21.4 × 24.9	Supine, neutral	12	11	13	13
6	F	35	Schwannoma	Trigeminal, Rt	41.7 × 31.5 × 27.3	Supine, neutral	11	12	11	13
7	F	70	Meningioma	ACP, Lt.	28 × 19.1 × 22.2	Supine, neutral	14	15	14	17
8	M	58	Schwannoma	CS, Rt.	25.1 × 23 × 22.4	Supine, neutral	13	14	14	15
9	F	23	Glioma	Temporal tip	20.3 × 21.2 × 18.6	Supine, neutral	13	11	14	11

ACP anterior clinoid process, CS cavernous sinus, F female, IOP intraocular pressure, Lt left; M male, Postop. postoperative, PPF pterygopalatine fossa, Preop. preoperative, Rt right

ISSN: 1471-2415