Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic, percentages and clinical findings of the subjects in both groups

From: Effect of corneal refractive surgery on accommodative and binocular dysfunctions among civilian pilots in Southwest China

 

CRS group

Emmetropia group

P value

Age (years):

30.33 ± 4.60 (23–35)

29.64 ± 3.77 (23–35)

0.296

Gender (M/F):

106/2

98/1

0.533

Spherical equivalent (D):

−0.023 ± 0.52

0.023 ± 0.30

0.268

Diagnosis:

 ADs and BDs

17 (15.7%)

15 (15.2)

0.524

 Asymptomatic CI

8 (7.41%)

7 (7.07%)

0.570

 NBV subjects

83 (76.85%)

77 (77.78%)

 Total

108 (100%)

99 (100%)

Clinical findings

 AA (right eye only, D)

9.65 ± 2.06

9.27 ± 1.78

0.206

 MAF (right eye only, cpm)

12.81 ± 6.93

11.80 ± 6.64

0.434

 BAF (cpm)

12.41 ± 6.44

10.73 ± 5.79

0.068

 MEM (right eye only, D)

−0.076 ± 0.55

−0.025 ± 0.50

0.494

 PRA (D)

−2.66 ± 1.49

−2.35 ± 1.37

0.122

 NRA (D)

1.87 ± 0.60

1.73 ± 0.60

0.136

Phoria (Δ)

 Near

−3.73 ± 4.94

−3.59 ± 5.32

0.505

 Distance

−1.56 ± 2.51

−1.53 ± 2.63

0.481

PFV (Near break point) (Δ)

23.00 ± 7.72

22.37 ± 7.72

0.468

NFV (Near break point) (Δ)

20.53 ± 5.39

19.89 ± 4.81

0.246

  1. CRS Corneal refractive surgery, SE Spherical equivalent, ADs Accommodative dysfunctions, BDs Binocular dysfunctions, CI Convergence insufficiency, NBV Normal visual binocular, AA Accommodative amplitude, BAF Binocular accommodative facility, MAF Monocular accommodative facility, MEM Monocular estimated method, NPC Near point of convergence, PFV Positive fusional vergence, NFV Negative fusional vergence, PRA Positive relative accommodation, NRA Negative relative accommodation