From: Treatment outcomes of retinal vein occlusion in clinical practice in Nepal
CRVO | BRVO | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Patients, n | 39 | 60 | |
Baseline VA logMAR, mean (SD) | 1.13 (0.61) | 0.75 (0.42) | 0.001 |
Final VA logMAR, mean (SD)* | 0.92 (0.75) | 0.4 (0.4) | < 0.001 |
Change VA logMAR*, mean (95% CI) | −0.2 (− 0.43, 0.02) | −0.35 (− 0.46, − 0.23) | 0.25 |
VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR, % (baseline/final*) | 10 / 36 | 20 / 63 | 0.01 |
VA ≥ 1 logMAR, % (baseline/final*) | 59 /47 | 37 /12 | < 0.001 |
Improvement ≥3 lines*, % | 32 | 60 | 0.37 |
Worsening ≥3 lines*, % | 8 | 7 | 0.31 |
Baseline IOP mmHg, mean (SD) | 19 (11) | 16 (3) | 0.07 |
Final IOP mmHg, mean (SD)* | 17 (2) | 15 (5) | 0.05 |
Change IOP mmHg*, mean (95% CI) | −3 (−6, 0) | −2 (−4, −1) | 0.64 |
Baseline CST μm, mean (SD) | 519 (213) | 423 (151) | 0.02 |
Final CST μm, mean (SD)* | 343 (160) | 281 (133) | 0.09 |
Change CST μm*, mean (95% CI) | −184 (−276, −91) | − 114 (− 189, −40) | 0.24 |
Injections α, median (Q1, Q3) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) | 1 |
Additional Macular Laser, n | 0 | 2 | 0.52 |
Additional Triamcinolone, n | 2 | 2 | 0.65 |
Additional PRP/Sectoral Laser, n | 16 | 15 | 0.17 |