Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic descriptive data, (n = 92)

From: Assessing patient cosmetic satisfaction after glaucoma drainage device surgery for different patch grafts

 

Cornea

(n = 24)

Sclera

(n = 30)

Pericardium (n = 38)

Statistic, p

Institution

   

Χ2 = 51.2, p < 0.001

 1

8

28

3

 

 2

16

2

35

 

Age, m ± sd

50.3 ± 18.5

57.5 ± 12.4

44.9 ± 18.9

F = 4.63, p = 0.012

Gender (M:F)

7: 17

18: 12

18: 20

Χ2 = 3.42, p = 0.18

Glaucoma diagnosis

   

Fe P = 0.03

Open angle glaucoma

 Primary open angle

4

3

8

 

 Secondary open angle

5

0

7

 

Closed angle glaucoma

 Primary closed angle

0

3

0

 

 Secondary angle closure

3

3

1

 

Childhood glaucoma

 Congenital glaucoma

3

0

1

 

 Juvenile glaucoma

0

0

0

 

Other glaucomas

 Neovascular glaucoma

6

11

9

 

 Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

0

3

1

 

 Uveitic glaucoma

2

4

8

 

 Aphakic glaucoma

0

1

3

 

 Combined mechanism

1

2

0

 

Presence of diabetes (%)

13

16

17

Χ2 = 0.72, p = 0.70

Number of AGM, M (IQR)

3.0 (0.25)

3.0 (0)

1.0 (2.0)

KW Χ2 = 14.23, p < 0.01

Ocular surface disease

   

Χ2 = 1.94, p = 0.75

 None

23

27

36

 

 Inflammatory conjunctival disease

0

0

0

 

 Exposure keratopathy

1

0

1

 

 Chronic blepharitis

0

3

1

 

Lens status

   

Χ2 = 4.57, p = 0.33

 Phakic

2

7

8

 

 Pseudophakic

18

22

25

 

 aphakic

4

1

5

 

Previous ocular surgeries,M (IQR)

3.0 (2.0)

3.0 (1.0)

2.0 (1.0)

KW Χ2 = 5.47, p = 0.065

  1. M male, F female, AGM antiglaucoma medication, m ± sd mean and standard deviation, M (IQR) median and interquartile range, Χ2 chi-squared statistic, KW Kruskal-Wallis statistic, Fe Fisher exact