Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic descriptive data, (n = 92)

From: Assessing patient cosmetic satisfaction after glaucoma drainage device surgery for different patch grafts

  Cornea
(n = 24)
Sclera
(n = 30)
Pericardium (n = 38) Statistic, p
Institution     Χ2 = 51.2, p < 0.001
 1 8 28 3  
 2 16 2 35  
Age, m ± sd 50.3 ± 18.5 57.5 ± 12.4 44.9 ± 18.9 F = 4.63, p = 0.012
Gender (M:F) 7: 17 18: 12 18: 20 Χ2 = 3.42, p = 0.18
Glaucoma diagnosis     Fe P = 0.03
Open angle glaucoma
 Primary open angle 4 3 8  
 Secondary open angle 5 0 7  
Closed angle glaucoma
 Primary closed angle 0 3 0  
 Secondary angle closure 3 3 1  
Childhood glaucoma
 Congenital glaucoma 3 0 1  
 Juvenile glaucoma 0 0 0  
Other glaucomas
 Neovascular glaucoma 6 11 9  
 Pseudoexfoliation glaucoma 0 3 1  
 Uveitic glaucoma 2 4 8  
 Aphakic glaucoma 0 1 3  
 Combined mechanism 1 2 0  
Presence of diabetes (%) 13 16 17 Χ2 = 0.72, p = 0.70
Number of AGM, M (IQR) 3.0 (0.25) 3.0 (0) 1.0 (2.0) KW Χ2 = 14.23, p < 0.01
Ocular surface disease     Χ2 = 1.94, p = 0.75
 None 23 27 36  
 Inflammatory conjunctival disease 0 0 0  
 Exposure keratopathy 1 0 1  
 Chronic blepharitis 0 3 1  
Lens status     Χ2 = 4.57, p = 0.33
 Phakic 2 7 8  
 Pseudophakic 18 22 25  
 aphakic 4 1 5  
Previous ocular surgeries,M (IQR) 3.0 (2.0) 3.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) KW Χ2 = 5.47, p = 0.065
  1. M male, F female, AGM antiglaucoma medication, m ± sd mean and standard deviation, M (IQR) median and interquartile range, Χ2 chi-squared statistic, KW Kruskal-Wallis statistic, Fe Fisher exact
\