Table 4 WMD of SE and Odds Ratio of proportion of eyes with SE within ±1.0 D 1 year after operation
Study (publication year) | Follow-up | SE value | SE within ±1D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMD [95% CI] | %Weight | OR[95% CI] | %Weight | ||
Parsipour et.al(2016) [4] | 1y | −0.39[− 0.974,0.194] | 8.48 | 0.378 [0.122,1.172] | 38.33 |
Karimian et.al(2014) [9] | 30 ± 11 | −0.38[− 0.587,-0.173] | 27.78 | 0.136 [0.036,0.521] | 27.27 |
Tahzib et.al(2008) [15] | 1y | 0.02[−0.221,0.261] | 24.88 | / | / |
Kohnen et.al(2008) [14] | 1y | −0.16[− 0.479,0.159] | 19.16 | / | / |
Coullet et.al(2006) [5] | 1y | −0.43[− 0.741,-0.119] | 19.70 | 0.266 [0.081,0.879] | 34.39 |
Combined effect size | Pooled WMD[95% CI]: −0.249[− 0.44,-0.058], Test of WMD = 0: z = 2.56, p = 0.01* | Pooled OR[95% CI] 0.254 [0.126,0.511], Test of OR = 1: z = 3.84, p < 0.01 * | |||
Heterogeneity | chi2 = 8.15(d.f. = 4), I2 = 50.9%, p = 0.086 | Chi2 = 1.32(d.f. = 2), p = 0.517, I2 = 0 | |||