Skip to main content

Table 3 Hazard ratio analyzed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models

From: Comparison of 5-year outcomes between trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy followed by phacoemulsification: a retrospective cohort study

Factor

Criteria

A

B

C

HR (95% Cl)

p Value

HR (95% Cl)

p Value

HR (95% Cl)

p Value

Age (years)

0.97 (0.95–0.99)

0.02*

0.98 (0.95–0.99)

0.04*

0.98 (0.96–1.00)

0.07

Sex, F/M

1,24 (0.75–2.07)

0.41

1.01 (0.62–1.64)

0.96

0.98 (0.64–1.50)

0.93

Preoperative IOP per mmHg

0.94 (0.91–0.98)

< 0.01*

0.96 (0.93–0.99)

0.04*

1.00 (0.96–1.03)

0.71

Conjunctival incision (Fornix/limbus based)

0.93 (0.55–1.55)

0.77

0.96 (0.58–1.58)

0.86

1.06 (0.69–1.64)

0.80

EXG/POAG

0.58 (0.26–1.29)

0.18

0.67 (0.31–1.47)

0.65

1.07 (0.50–2.31)

0.86

SG/POAG

0.71 (0.28–1.77)

0.46

0.79 (0.32–1.95)

0.61

0.99 (0.42–2.32)

0.98

TLE combined with phaco

2.31 (1.22–4.38)

0.01*

2.26 (1.22–4.18)

0.01*

2.23 (1.30–3.82)

< 0.01*

Number of glaucoma medications

1.04 (0.80–1.35)

0.77

1.06 (0.82–1.35)

0.68

1.12 (0.90–1.40)

0.31

  1. HR Hazard ratio, F Female, M Male, IOP Intraocular pressure, POAG Primary, EXG Exfoliation glaucoma, SG Secondary glaucoma due to uveitis, Posner Posner-Schlossman syndrome, TLE Trabeculectomy, Phaco phacoemulsification.
  2. *Log-rank test