Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons and correlation between CHM and other cornea power parameters

From: Scheimpflug analysis of corneal power changes after hyperopic small incision lenticule extraction

Cornea power

Mean ± SD

(D)

Difference vs CHM (D)

P value

Correlation Coefficient

P value

CHM

45.88 ± 1.83

/

   

Km

45.56 ± 1.73

−0.32 ± 0.80

0.06

0.900

0.00

EKR4.0 mm

45.41 ± 1.74

−0.34 ± 1.04

0.13

0.823

0.00

EKR4.5 mm

45.50 ± 1.71

−0.25 ± 1.01

0.24

0.831

0.00

PR2.0 mm

45.12 ± 1.83

−0.76 ± 0.97

0.00

0.858

0.00

PR3.0 mm

45.63 ± 1.90

−0.25 ± 0.97

0.22

0.866

0.00

PR4.0 mm

45.70 ± 1.94

−0.14 ± 1.03

0.39

0.858

0.00

PR5.0 mm

45.04 ± 1.87

−0.84 ± 1.00

0.00

0.852

0.00

PZ2.0 mm

44.75 ± 1.87

−1.13 ± 1.10

0.00

0.824

0.00

PZ3.0 mm

45.11 ± 1.84

−0.76 ± 0.98

0.00

0.857

0.00

PZ4.0 mm

45.38 ± 1.86

−0.50 ± 0.93

0.01

0.873

0.00

PZ5.0 mm

45.36 ± 1.85

−0.51 ± 0.90

0.01

0.881

0.00

AR2.0 mm

45.18 ± 1.91

−0.69 ± 0.96

0.00

0.870

0.00

AR3.0 mm

45.57 ± 1.95

−0.31 ± 0.94

0.12

0.879

0.00

AR4.0 mm

45.48 ± 1.97

−0.39 ± 0.96

0.06

0.874

0.00

AR5.0 mm

44.72 ± 1.90

−1.16 ± 1.00

0.00

0.856

0.00

AZ2.0 mm

44.93 ± 1.92

−0.95 ± 1.05

0.00

0.850

0.00

AZ3.0 mm

45.19 ± 1.91

−0.68 ± 0.94

0.00

0.876

0.00

AZ4.0 mm

45.36 ± 1.91

−0.52 ± 0.91

0.01

0.883

0.00

AZ5.0 mm

45.26 ± 1.89

−0.61 ± 0.89

0.00

0.885

0.00

  1. PR: Taking the center of pupil as the center, the average value was calculated by ring
  2. PZ: Taking the center of pupil as the center, the average value was calculated by zone
  3. AR: Taking the corneal apex as the center, the average value was calculated by ring
  4. AZ: Taking the corneal apex as the center, the average value was calculated by zone
  5. CHM Clinical history method