Skip to main content

Table 1 Sample descriptive statistics and univariate analysis results

From: Understanding risks of refractive error among Chinese children amidst pandemic disruptions: results from a rapid survey

Variables

Frequency (% of Total)

Occurrence of Near-sighted Refractive Error (Yes = 1, No = 0)

Frequency (Yes = 1)

% of Category

p-value

Occurrence of Near-sighted Refractive Error

 Yes

711 (68.2)

 No

1523 (31.8)

Sex a

 Female

1070 (47.9)

338

31.6

0.817

 Male

1164 (52.1)

373

32.0

Grade Level a

 1st

291 (13.0)

73

25.1

0.061

 2nd

404 (18.1)

120

29.7

 3rd

318 (14.2)

109

34.3

 4th

420 (18.8)

133

31.7

 5th

363 (16.2)

128

35.3

 6th

438 (19.6)

148

33.8

Residential Location a

 Rural

453 (20.3)

152

33.6

0.289

 Urban-Rural Transitional

174 (7.8)

47

27.0

 Urban

1607 (71.9)

512

31.9

Prior Refractive Error Condition a

 Yes

502 (22.5)

286

57.0

0.000***

 No

1732 (77.5)

425

24.5

Proximity-weighted e-Screen Use, dh

(mean, s.d.) b

11.04 (8.91)

mean (1) – mean (0)

= 3.64

0.000***

Illuminance-weighted e-Screen Use, h • W m−2 sr −1

(mean, s.d.) b

0.64 (0.45)

mean (1) – mean (0)

= 0.21

0.000***

Level of Psychosocial Stress a

 Apprehensive

318 (14.2)

176

55.4

0.000***

 Composed

375 (16.8)

75

20.0

 Indifferent

1541 (69.0)

460

29.9

Frequency of Outdoor Activity a

 7 times/week

414 (18.5)

135

32.6

0.088

 4–6 times/week

288 (12.9)

79

27.4

 1–3 times/week

1123 (50.3)

349

31.1

 0 times/week

409 (18.3)

148

36.2

  1. a p-value based on χ2 test, b p-value based on T-test. *** indicates p-value< 0.050