Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariate logistical regression analysis results

From: Understanding risks of refractive error among Chinese children amidst pandemic disruptions: results from a rapid survey

Variables

DV: Occurrence of Near-sighted Refractive Error (Yes = 1, No = 0)

Model 1

(Proximity-weighted, dh)

Model 2

(Illuminance-weighted, h•W m−2 sr−1)

OR

95% CI

p-value

OR

95% CI

p-value

e-Screen Use, daily hours

1.036

1.024–1.047

0.000***

2.285

1.829–2.855

0.000***

Level of Psychosocial Stress

 Apprehensive

2.441

1.870–3.187

0.000***

2.403

1.839–3.141

0.000***

 Composed

0.671

0.503–0.894

0.006***

0.667

0.500–0.890

0.006***

 Indifferent

1

1

Frequency Outdoor Activity

 7 times/week

1.189

0.866–1.632

0.284

1.222

0.889–1.681

0.217

 4–6 times/week

0.871

0.610–1.244

0.447

0.881

0.616–1.261

0.489

 1–3 times/week

0.968

0.745–1.258

0.809

0.972

0.747–1.265

0.831

 0 times/week

1

1

Sex

 Female

0.960

0.791–1.164

0.675

0.957

0.788–1.162

0.658

 Male

1

1

Grade Level

 1st

1.335

1.044–1.930

0.018***

1.428

1.080–2.071

0.030***

 2nd

1.455

1.047–2.022

0.025***

1.522

1.092–2.122

0.013***

 3rd

1.469

1.042–2.069

0.028***

1.474

1.045–2.079

0.027***

 4th

1.289

0.939–1.769

0.116

1.334

0.970–1.834

0.076

 5th

1.178

0.852–1.629

0.323

1.171

0.846–1.622

0.340

 6th

1

1

Residential Location

 Rural

1.036

0.808–1.326

0.782

1.020

0.796–1.307

0.876

 Urban-Rural

0.767

0.523–1.125

0.175

0.764

0.520–1.123

0.171

 Urban

1

1

Prior Refractive Error Condition

 Yes

3.853

3.077–4.826

0.000***

3.827

3.053–4.798

0.000***

 No

1

1

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
  2. *** indicates p-value< 0.050