Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of OCT and OCTA parameters in eyes with or without 106Ru brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma

From: Evaluation of radiation maculopathy after treatment of choroidal melanoma with ruthenium-106 using optical coherence tomography angiography

 

Treatment status

Difference (CI95%)

P-value†

Yes (n = 22)

No (n = 21)

Foveal thickness μm

291.81 ± 144.13

248.46 ± 35.08

−44.16 (− 101–13.40)

0.133

FAZ μm2

Superficial

1629 ± 2063

428 ± 778

− 1200 (− 2036–− 363)

0.005

Deep

1837 ± 2252

268 ± 120

− 1569 (− 2504–− 634)

0.001

Superficial vascular density %

Fovea

22.22 ± 8.33

29.43 ± 3.81

7.24 (3.64–10.84)

< 0.001

Parafovea

23.54 ± 9.29

32.13 ± 4.11

8.58 (4.38–12.77

< 0.001

Deep vascular density %

Fovea

23.25 ± 9.38

34.67 ± 3.55

11.38 (7.15–15.61)

< 0.001

Parafovea

24.29 ± 9.91

36.58 ± 3.54

12.19 (7.57–16.81)

< 0.001

Choriocapillaris flow area mm2

1.92 ± 0.26

2.12 ± 0.10

0.20 (0.09–0.30)

< 0.001

Superficial skeleton density %

Fovea

8.36 ± 3.43

11.46 ± 1.54

3.13 (1.73–4.53)

< 0.001

Parafovea

8.80 ± 3.84

12.47 ± 1.65

3.69 (2.06–5.32)

< 0.001

Deep skeleton density %

Fovea

10.03 ± 4.11

15.18 ± 1.55

5.14 (3.30–6.98)

< 0.001

Parafovea

10.29 ± 4.37

15.90 ± 1.53

5.56 (3.55–7.57)

< 0.001

  1. FAZ Foveal avascular zone
  2. †Based on GEE analysis