Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of OCT and OCTA parameters in eyes with or without 106Ru brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma

From: Evaluation of radiation maculopathy after treatment of choroidal melanoma with ruthenium-106 using optical coherence tomography angiography

  Treatment status Difference (CI95%) P-value†
Yes (n = 22) No (n = 21)
Foveal thickness μm 291.81 ± 144.13 248.46 ± 35.08 −44.16 (− 101–13.40) 0.133
FAZ μm2 Superficial 1629 ± 2063 428 ± 778 − 1200 (− 2036–− 363) 0.005
Deep 1837 ± 2252 268 ± 120 − 1569 (− 2504–− 634) 0.001
Superficial vascular density % Fovea 22.22 ± 8.33 29.43 ± 3.81 7.24 (3.64–10.84) < 0.001
Parafovea 23.54 ± 9.29 32.13 ± 4.11 8.58 (4.38–12.77 < 0.001
Deep vascular density % Fovea 23.25 ± 9.38 34.67 ± 3.55 11.38 (7.15–15.61) < 0.001
Parafovea 24.29 ± 9.91 36.58 ± 3.54 12.19 (7.57–16.81) < 0.001
Choriocapillaris flow area mm2 1.92 ± 0.26 2.12 ± 0.10 0.20 (0.09–0.30) < 0.001
Superficial skeleton density % Fovea 8.36 ± 3.43 11.46 ± 1.54 3.13 (1.73–4.53) < 0.001
Parafovea 8.80 ± 3.84 12.47 ± 1.65 3.69 (2.06–5.32) < 0.001
Deep skeleton density % Fovea 10.03 ± 4.11 15.18 ± 1.55 5.14 (3.30–6.98) < 0.001
Parafovea 10.29 ± 4.37 15.90 ± 1.53 5.56 (3.55–7.57) < 0.001
  1. FAZ Foveal avascular zone
  2. †Based on GEE analysis