Skip to main content

Table 1 Biometric measurements of study subjects

From: The effect of orthokeratology treatment zone decentration on myopia progression

Variables

mean ± SD, n (%)

All

n= 217

Mildly

n = 65

Moderately

n = 114

Severely

n = 38

P-valuea

Age (years)

12.43 ± 1.73

12.49 ± 1.75

12.45 ± 1.58

12.26 ± 2.10

0.621

Gender (male)

102 (47)

31 (48)

56 (49)

15 (40)

0.582

SER

-3.10 ± 1.20

-2.95 ± 1.30

-3.10 ± 1.20

-3.30 ± 1.04

0.328

SRE

-3.0 ± 1.12

-2.86 ± 1.16

-3.01 ± 1.12

-3.19 ± 1.04

0.285

RA

90 (41)

28 (43)

48 (42)

15 (39)

0.937

Baseline AL

24.81 ± 0.83

24.75 ± 0.90

24.80 ± 0.80

24.97 ± 0.77

0.417

Flat K

42.70 ± 1.28

42.81 ± 1.49

42.69 ± 1.19

42.51 ± 1.18

0.530

Steep K

43.66 ± 1.39

43.74 ± 1.56

43.68 ± 1.33

43.45 ± 1.33

0.660

DD, mm

0.69 ± 0.32

0.35 ± 0.11

0.71 ± 0.13

1.21 ± 0.22

<0.001

DA

192.43 ± 74.33

189.89 ± 76.90

188.03 ± 74.17

209.94 ± 69.58

0.111

Flat E

0.59 ± 0.14

0.61 ± 0.12

0.59 ± 0.15

0.56 ± 0.15

0.324

  1. SER Spherical equivalent refractive error, SRE Spherical refractive error, RA Regular astigmatism, AL Axial length, DD Decentered distance, DA Decentered Angle
  2. aAccording to the distribution, Kruskal–Wallis H test or ANOVA was adopted to compare characteristics among the three groups.