Table 4 Comparison of total operative and vitrectomy times across different 25G studies
From: Clinical outcomes of a beveled tip, ultra-high speed, 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy system
Surgical Parameter | Indication | Instrumentation | Time (Minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|
Total Operative Time | RRD | 25G, beveled tip, 10,000 cpm (Current Study) | 39.0 ± 14.2 |
25G, flat tip, 7500 cpm (Sborgia et al., 2019) [11] | 64.4 ± 9.5 | ||
ERM | 25G, beveled tip, 10,000 cpm (Current Study) | 22.4 ± 4.1 | |
25G, flat tip, 5000 cpm (Naruse et al., 2017) [9] | 32.7 ± 10.1 | ||
25G, flat tip, 5000 cpm (Mitsui et al., 2016) [8] | 16.1 ± 9.3 | ||
Total Vitrectomy Time | RRD | 25G, beveled tip, 10,000 cpm (Current Study) | 14.4 ± 5 |
25G, flat tip, 7500 cpm (Sborgia et al., 2019) [11] | 20.8 ± 3.8 | ||
25G, flat tip, 7500 cpm (Rizzo et al., 2017) [10] | 19.6 ± 7.3 | ||
ERM | 25G, beveled tip, 10,000 cpm (Current Study) | 4.7 ± 1.7 | |
25G, flat tip, 5000 cpm (Mitsui et al., 2016) [8] | 6.2 ± 2.7 | ||
Various Indications | 25G, beveled tip, 1000 cpm (Current Study) | 8.9 ± 6.5 | |
25G, flat tip, 7500 cpm (Rizzo et al., 2011) [14] | 18.4 ± 9.6 | ||
25G, flat tip, 5000 cpm (Rizzo et al., 2011) [14] | 26.4 ± 14.6 |