Skip to main content

Table 4 Table comparing ranged percentage responses between those that had met someone with nystagmus and those that had not

From: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals with nystagmus and an exploration of public assumptions about the condition: an electronic questionnaire study

 

Public Met (n = 280)

Public Had Not Met (n = 516)

Number of Responses (%)

Number of Responses (%)

COVID-19

 0%

84 (30)

184 (35.7)

 1–25%

14 (5)

36 (7)

 26–50%

48 (17.1)

91 (17.6)

 51–75%

80 (28.6)

119 (23.1)

 76–100%

54 (19.3)

86 (16.7)

Social Interaction

 0%

20 (7.1)

62 (12)

 1–25%

18 (6.4)

30 (5.8)

 26–50%

56 (20)

120 (23.3)

 51–75%

103 (36.8)

160 (31)

 76–100%

83 (29.6)

144 (27.9)

Video meetings

 0%

25 (8.9)

72 (14)

 1–25%

13 (4.6)

35 (6.8)

 26–50%

48 (17.1)

113 (21.9)

 51–75%

119 (42.5)

160 (31)

 76–100%

75 (26.8)

136 (26.4)

Visual Impairments

 0%

68 (24.3)

172 (33.3)

 1–25%

19 (6.8)

28 (5.4)

 26–50%

55 (19.6)

81 (15.7)

 51–75%

70 (25)

130 (25.2)

 76–100%

68 (24.3)

105 (20.3)

Child School Support

 0%

40 (14.3)

111 (21.5)

 1–25%

22 (7.9)

48 (9.3)

 26–50%

65 (23.2)

114 (22.1)

 51–75%

101 (36.1)

134 (26)

 76–100%

52 (18.6)

109 (21.1)

Driving License

 0%

89 (31.8)

161 (31.2)

 1–25%

35 (12.5)

33 (6.4)

 26–50%

54 (19.3)

88 (17.1)

 51–75%

63 (22.5)

117 (22.7)

 76–100%

39 (13.9)

117 (22.7)

Day Vision Variance

 0%

41 (14.6)

88 (17.1)

 1–25%

17 (6.1)

30 (5.8)

 26–50%

70 (25)

129 (25)

 51–75%

89 (31.8)

162 (31.4)

 76–100%

63 (22.5)

107 (20.7)

Smartphone Usage

 0%

23 (8.2)

90 (17.4)

 1–25%

11 (3.9)

28 (5.4)

 26–50%

46 (16.4)

71 (13.8)

 51–75%

87 (31.1)

154 (29.8)

 76–100%

113 (40.4)

173 (33.5)

  1. 0% indicates the answer "no effect", indicating the participants who believed that nystagmus does not affect a certain aspect