Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Ophthalmology

Fig. 3

From: Quantitative assessment of eye movements using a binocular paradigm: comparison among amblyopic, recovered amblyopic and normal children

Fig. 3

Examples of test results from the three groups. Left column: results of the sustained fixation test. On the left of each graph, the mean horizontal/vertical deviations (pixels) from both eyes were calculated respectively for 9 locations. On the right of each graph, the red numbers around the center of each location were the gaze positions extracted during the test. Right column: results of the visually guided saccade test. In the middle of each graph, the mean horizontal/vertical deviations (pixels) from both eyes were calculated respectively for 8 locations. On the two sides of each graph, the red numbers around the center of each location were the gaze positions extracted during the test. The amblyopic participant showed poor accuracy and precision in static and post-saccadic fixation, while the participant with recovered amblyopia showed similar results with the control

Back to article page